Property:Contains text
- Text
- schema:text (schema | Schema.org, V 14.0)
D
hi peter, yes, the `[[...]]` (wikilinks) syntax has been quite widely adopted, spread from wikis! +
my examples are more the latter.
there are also strong roots in this idea of [[Infrastructure]] in CSCW, studying lots of attempts to get scientists to adopt new infrastructure and why they... didn't work.
one challenge is the [[Claim]] that "infrastructures often fail because of the inertia of the installed base" (existing software, workflows, norms, institutions, legal codes, etc.)
one decent entry point [[Source]] on this:
Information Infrastructures and the Challenge of the Installed Base +
another classic [[Source]] on [[Infrastructure]] is Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces +
<@690574739785121815> can probably point to others, including his own work with the [[GLOBE system]] 🙂
http://globe.umbc.edu/
[[Source]]: Infrastructuring for Cross-Disciplinary Synthetic Science: Meta-Study Research in Land System Science +
a bit further afield, i'd point to the [[Open Science Framework]] as a thoughtful case study in incentive mechanism design focused on integration into *intrinsic* benefits (i'm more thoughtful about my science, i can easily document things so i don't forget them)
this podcast interview is a decent look into how he thinks about things: https://everythinghertz.com/69
if i read him right, i sort of agree that infrastructure (possibility) an usability and communities (norms) are prior to / foundational to incentives and policy. top-down incentives and policies that don't align with existing norms and usable practices may risk incentivizing 'just comply with it' practices or just fall flat, like some data sharing mandates. +
[[Source]] for the figure in the previous msg: https://assets.pubpub.org/5nv701md/01521405455055.pdf +
I think this is probably covered by [[Glamorous Toolkit]] (cc <@499904513038090240> who is a core user)! +
[[Blue Obelisk]] is (i.e. still active) a remote asynchronous collaboration with no central management or funding. A large part consists of nodes representing software packages. See [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Obelisk]]. It works because several of the authors knew/know each other and agreed at the outset to adopt an interoperability mantra "Open Data, Open Standards, Open Source" (ODOSOS).
Because everyone agrees the same approach to interoperability the nodes can develop indeoendently! The management is informal - a mailing list and occasional back channels. So there is a collaborative network - see WP article. +
Yes, as a scientist I also made this assumption. For example the [[IPCC report]] is 10,000 pages of scientific discourse. Hmm! +
We have been developing code for extraction of "claims" from IPCC [[executive summary]]s . <@322545403876868096> <@499904513038090240> So far we have the following design:
* exec summary for chapter => 15-20 paras
* bold leading sentence for each para => leading_claim
* subsequent sentences => supporting_claims
* annotation (high +
Thanks for [[Glamorous Toolkit]] . Watched the video and understood most of it. Impressive, and maybe the future, but not quite what I wanted now - it requires a fluency with creating new types of object on the fly and so a change in orientation. I want something that I can tag the methods with (say) 'PDF conversion', 'prototype`, etc. I don't mind dumping that as static docs and navigating with Obsidian. +
Once again i am talking about my [[Test Topic]] that's a part of my [[Test Project]] and i want to see some links in the reply +
Now hopefully without the uncaught exceptions for [[Test Topic]] +
Now I am going to link a message into a specific section in my [[Test Topic#New Section]] and also see if we propagate that through to the wikilinks in [[Test Project]] +
i'll leave the bot running for a lil bit but yeah it's just running on my laptop for now, will move it over to the linode running the wiki when i go to switch the url. made a page to document the [[WikiBot#Status Updates]] +
[[Testing Wikibot]] +
I would suggest turning [[Discord#Notifications]] off for this channel. on mobile click the person looking icon in the top right and then the notification options are near the top. on desktop there should be a bell-looking icon along the top row of icons +
[[Testing Wikibot]] +
[[Testing Wikibot]] +
[[Testing Wikibot2]] +