Talk:Discourse Modeling: Difference between revisions

→‎A Discourse Graph for our own Wiki: rewriting a sentence into a claim - is this permissible in creating a DG?
(→‎A Discourse Graph for our own Wiki: rewriting a sentence into a claim - is this permissible in creating a DG?)
Line 59: Line 59:
**[[question]] what does it mean to have different graphs that share some pieces, or different graphs in or close to the same namespace
**[[question]] what does it mean to have different graphs that share some pieces, or different graphs in or close to the same namespace
**[[claim]] these issues --> boil down to the naming of the pieces and how you place the connections - how much context do you need to figure out how many connections there are?
**[[claim]] these issues --> boil down to the naming of the pieces and how you place the connections - how much context do you need to figure out how many connections there are?
*KM: taking this as an opportunity to  learn SPARQL
*KM: taking this as an opportunity to  learn SPARQL ('''-->''' [[claim]] this is a good opportunity to learn SPARQL)
*KM: [[claim]] we need namespaces before we can query anything - naming is critical!
*KM: [[claim]] we need namespaces before we can query anything - naming is critical!
*SJ: [[claim]] we should name and make list of queries - queries need their own names
*SJ: [[claim]] we should name and make list of queries - queries need their own names
35

edits