35
edits
Talk:Discourse Modeling: Difference between revisions
Talk:Discourse Modeling (view source)
Revision as of 10:28, 13 November 2022
, 10:28, 13 November 2022→What exactly makes a graph a Discourse Graph?: add tags
(→What exactly makes a graph a Discourse Graph?: add tags) |
|||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
=== What exactly makes a graph a [[Discourse Graph]]? === | === What exactly makes a graph a [[Discourse Graph]]? === | ||
*[[question]]: can a discourse be about a topic? are discourses about a certain over-arching hypothesis where you make claims and discover evidence? | |||
**KH: what do you do when your discourse does not fit a DG? | **KH: [[question]] what do you do when your discourse does not fit a DG? | ||
***examples from physics with no well-posed question | ***examples from physics with no well-posed question | ||
**discussion of results graphs and requests for experiments | **discussion of results graphs and requests for experiments | ||
**need to figure out how DGs work in these different fields and circumstances | **[[proposal]] need to figure out how DGs work in these different fields and circumstances | ||
**SJ: meta: need to identify existing discourse maps, and existing graphs, that could be thought of as DGs (proofs, discourse diagrams, text summarization graphs, argument maps, decision maps + flowcharts, ...) | **SJ: meta:[[proposal]] need to identify existing discourse maps, and existing graphs, that could be thought of as DGs (proofs, discourse diagrams, text summarization graphs, argument maps, decision maps + flowcharts, ...) | ||
*SJ: [[proposal]] need to capture axioms / assumptions | |||
*KH: [[proposal]] making tacit knowledge explicit!! | |||
== Section 3 Kyle == | == Section 3 Kyle == | ||