Reading List: Difference between revisions
(→Linked Data: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Text=in the spirit of cultivating our garden: [[Reading List]] https://hapgood.us/2015/10/17/the-garden-and-the-stream-a-technopastoral/amp/ | |Text=in the spirit of cultivating our garden: [[Reading List]] https://hapgood.us/2015/10/17/the-garden-and-the-stream-a-technopastoral/amp/ | ||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1033091723389317160/1038112016038101062 | |Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1033091723389317160/1038112016038101062 | ||
}}{{Message | |||
|Author=joelchan86 | |||
|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/322545403876868096/6dd171845a7a4e30603d98ae510c77b8.png?size=1024 | |||
|Date Sent=22-11-10 21:38:25 | |||
|Channel=discourse graphs | |||
|Text=in human-computer interaction we have a similar problem of trying to think about and synthesize across many genres of contributions/research. one map (adapted for information studies) breaks things out into "empirical" contributions (these most often follow the standard intro/methods/results/discussion format), "conceptual" contributions (which are often more amorphous theory papers), and "constructive" contributions (making a new system/method) | |||
from here: HCI Research as Problem-Solving | Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems | |||
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2858036.2858283 | |||
cc [[Reading List]] | |||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040214388554084372/1040379933115043912 | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 21:37, 10 November 2022
Discord
in the spirit of cultivating our garden: Reading List https://hapgood.us/2015/10/17/the-garden-and-the-stream-a-technopastoral/amp/
in human-computer interaction we have a similar problem of trying to think about and synthesize across many genres of contributions/research. one map (adapted for information studies) breaks things out into "empirical" contributions (these most often follow the standard intro/methods/results/discussion format), "conceptual" contributions (which are often more amorphous theory papers), and "constructive" contributions (making a new system/method)
from here: HCI Research as Problem-Solving
Linked Data
To add to the Reading List#Linked Data on Linked Data, Standards, and Collaboration: a piece from one of the authors of ActivityPub on the merger of the distributed messaging and linked data communities that I think puts into context what a massive achievement AP was http://dustycloud.org/blog/on-standards-divisions-collaboration/