]> 2026-04-17T17:39:26+00:00 Reading List 0 en 2022-11-12T03:29:31Z 2459895.6454977 Reading List 0 in the spirit of cultivating our garden: [[Reading List]] https://hapgood.us/2015/10/17/the-garden-and-the-stream-a-technopastoral/amp/ 0004-11-20T15:26:31Z 1722845.1434144 Reading List#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-04 15:26:31 0 To add to the [[Reading List#Linked Data]] on [[Linked Data]], [[Standards]], and [[Collaboration]]: a piece from one of the authors of [[ActivityPub]] on the merger of the distributed messaging and linked data communities that I think puts into context what a massive achievement AP was http://dustycloud.org/blog/on-standards-divisions-collaboration/ 0008-11-20T23:32:39Z 1724306.4810069 Reading List#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-08 23:32:39 0 in human-computer interaction we have a similar problem of trying to think about and synthesize across many genres of contributions/research. one map (adapted for information studies) breaks things out into "empirical" contributions (these most often follow the standard intro/methods/results/discussion format), "conceptual" contributions (which are often more amorphous theory papers), and "constructive" contributions (making a new system/method) from here: HCI Research as Problem-Solving 0010-11-20T21:38:25Z 1725036.4016782 Reading List#joelchan86-22-11-10 21:38:25 0 I am definitely on team "scruffy" per Lindsay Poirier's typology (BTW "[[A Turn for the Scruffy]]" should be on the collective [[Reading List]] for anyone who hasn't come across it) and so yes definitely "Own-terminology" iterating into something shared, part of why i love the semwiki model of building them. On the other end of things for tomorrow - Is there any particular existing ontology/schema/etc. anyone in this group would like to have imported into the wiki for discourse modeling? 0012-11-20T03:30:30Z 1725766.6461806 Reading List#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-12 03:30:30 Has Topic 102 en Has Topic