Search by property
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Discord Messages#joelchan86-22-11-11 19:01:10 + (i agree it's not universal! my feeling is … i agree it's not universal! my feeling is that [[Claim]]: a statement (claim or evidence) might be the more universal element:</br>- empirical work also consists of statements about the world (this is less controversial)</br>- design/technological innovation rests in part on claims about a) what is needed in the world, what is hard to do, constraints, and b) what is needed to succeed: examples here: https://deepscienceventures.com/content/the-outcomes-graph-2 (h/t <@559775193242009610>)</br>- theories often consist of systems of core claims (e.g., in models like what <@824740026575355906> and <@734802666441408532> are working with, where we can think of the claims as subgraphs of the overall knowledge graph)</br></br>see, e.g., [[Evidence]] from this review of models of scientific knowledge https://publish.obsidian.md/joelchan-notes/discourse-graph/evidence/EVD+-+Four+positivist+epistemological+models+from+philosophy+of+science%2C+including+Popper%2C+emphasiz...+statements+as+a+core+component+of+scientific+knowledge+-+%40harsDesigningScientificKnowledge2001</br></br>and [[Evidence]] convergence/contrasts across users of the [[Roam Discourse Graph extension]] in terms of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidencems of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidence)
- Roam Discourse Graph extension#joelchan86-22-11-11 19:01:10 + (i agree it's not universal! my feeling is … i agree it's not universal! my feeling is that [[Claim]]: a statement (claim or evidence) might be the more universal element:</br>- empirical work also consists of statements about the world (this is less controversial)</br>- design/technological innovation rests in part on claims about a) what is needed in the world, what is hard to do, constraints, and b) what is needed to succeed: examples here: https://deepscienceventures.com/content/the-outcomes-graph-2 (h/t <@559775193242009610>)</br>- theories often consist of systems of core claims (e.g., in models like what <@824740026575355906> and <@734802666441408532> are working with, where we can think of the claims as subgraphs of the overall knowledge graph)</br></br>see, e.g., [[Evidence]] from this review of models of scientific knowledge https://publish.obsidian.md/joelchan-notes/discourse-graph/evidence/EVD+-+Four+positivist+epistemological+models+from+philosophy+of+science%2C+including+Popper%2C+emphasiz...+statements+as+a+core+component+of+scientific+knowledge+-+%40harsDesigningScientificKnowledge2001</br></br>and [[Evidence]] convergence/contrasts across users of the [[Roam Discourse Graph extension]] in terms of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidencems of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidence)
- Evidence#joelchan86-22-11-11 19:01:10 + (i agree it's not universal! my feeling is … i agree it's not universal! my feeling is that [[Claim]]: a statement (claim or evidence) might be the more universal element:</br>- empirical work also consists of statements about the world (this is less controversial)</br>- design/technological innovation rests in part on claims about a) what is needed in the world, what is hard to do, constraints, and b) what is needed to succeed: examples here: https://deepscienceventures.com/content/the-outcomes-graph-2 (h/t <@559775193242009610>)</br>- theories often consist of systems of core claims (e.g., in models like what <@824740026575355906> and <@734802666441408532> are working with, where we can think of the claims as subgraphs of the overall knowledge graph)</br></br>see, e.g., [[Evidence]] from this review of models of scientific knowledge https://publish.obsidian.md/joelchan-notes/discourse-graph/evidence/EVD+-+Four+positivist+epistemological+models+from+philosophy+of+science%2C+including+Popper%2C+emphasiz...+statements+as+a+core+component+of+scientific+knowledge+-+%40harsDesigningScientificKnowledge2001</br></br>and [[Evidence]] convergence/contrasts across users of the [[Roam Discourse Graph extension]] in terms of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidencems of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidence)
- Claim#joelchan86-22-11-11 19:01:10 + (i agree it's not universal! my feeling is … i agree it's not universal! my feeling is that [[Claim]]: a statement (claim or evidence) might be the more universal element:</br>- empirical work also consists of statements about the world (this is less controversial)</br>- design/technological innovation rests in part on claims about a) what is needed in the world, what is hard to do, constraints, and b) what is needed to succeed: examples here: https://deepscienceventures.com/content/the-outcomes-graph-2 (h/t <@559775193242009610>)</br>- theories often consist of systems of core claims (e.g., in models like what <@824740026575355906> and <@734802666441408532> are working with, where we can think of the claims as subgraphs of the overall knowledge graph)</br></br>see, e.g., [[Evidence]] from this review of models of scientific knowledge https://publish.obsidian.md/joelchan-notes/discourse-graph/evidence/EVD+-+Four+positivist+epistemological+models+from+philosophy+of+science%2C+including+Popper%2C+emphasiz...+statements+as+a+core+component+of+scientific+knowledge+-+%40harsDesigningScientificKnowledge2001</br></br>and [[Evidence]] convergence/contrasts across users of the [[Roam Discourse Graph extension]] in terms of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidencems of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidence)
- WikiBot#sneakers-the-rat-22-10-17 01:38:21 + (i'll leave the bot running for a lil bit but yeah it's just running on my laptop for now, will move it over to the linode running the wiki when i go to switch the url. made a page to document the [[WikiBot#Status Updates]])
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-10-17 01:38:21 + (i'll leave the bot running for a lil bit but yeah it's just running on my laptop for now, will move it over to the linode running the wiki when i go to switch the url. made a page to document the [[WikiBot#Status Updates]])
- Discord Messages#joelchan86-22-11-10 21:38:25 + (in human-computer interaction we have a si … in human-computer interaction we have a similar problem of trying to think about and synthesize across many genres of contributions/research. one map (adapted for information studies) breaks things out into "empirical" contributions (these most often follow the standard intro/methods/results/discussion format), "conceptual" contributions (which are often more amorphous theory papers), and "constructive" contributions (making a new system/method)</br></br>from here: HCI Research as Problem-Solvingfrom here: HCI Research as Problem-Solving)
- Reading List#joelchan86-22-11-10 21:38:25 + (in human-computer interaction we have a si … in human-computer interaction we have a similar problem of trying to think about and synthesize across many genres of contributions/research. one map (adapted for information studies) breaks things out into "empirical" contributions (these most often follow the standard intro/methods/results/discussion format), "conceptual" contributions (which are often more amorphous theory papers), and "constructive" contributions (making a new system/method)</br></br>from here: HCI Research as Problem-Solvingfrom here: HCI Research as Problem-Solving)
- Reading List#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-04 15:26:31 + (in the spirit of cultivating our garden: [[Reading List]] https://hapgood.us/2015/10/17/the-garden-and-the-stream-a-technopastoral/amp/)
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-04 15:26:31 + (in the spirit of cultivating our garden: [[Reading List]] https://hapgood.us/2015/10/17/the-garden-and-the-stream-a-technopastoral/amp/)
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-14 20:37:50 + (in thinking about some of the problems fro … in thinking about some of the problems from this weekend like the (affectionately titled) [[The Google Docs Problem]] and various other interface problems with the wiki, where it'll always be easier for people to interact with a system from something they're more used to using, I've been thinking about a more generalized kind of bridging where one can set a [[Context of Interoperability]] where for a given workshop, time period, project, etc. people can plug their tools together and work in a shared space without needing to make all of them anew - so for the simple example of this discord and this wiki, it should be possible to reuse this space to eg. connect to a different (or multiple) wikis, and vice versa to have a different discord connect to it. Along those lines, being able to have a synchronizing eg. git repository of the pages on the wiki so that people could edit them in obsidian or logseq or whatever their tool of choice is... this feels like an incredibly generic idea, so I feel like there must already be a ton of work on it, but it feels like it starts by just making a framework for bridging where the n-to-n problem is simplified by having a set of tools for auth and format translation and modeling documents and messages... I'm going to start sketching one piece of that with the [[Mediawiki-Git Bridge]], but I'm curious to hear if anyone either has any ideas, prior experience, or unmet needs that I might be orbiting around hereneeds that I might be orbiting around here)
- Mediawiki-Git Bridge#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-14 20:37:50 + (in thinking about some of the problems fro … in thinking about some of the problems from this weekend like the (affectionately titled) [[The Google Docs Problem]] and various other interface problems with the wiki, where it'll always be easier for people to interact with a system from something they're more used to using, I've been thinking about a more generalized kind of bridging where one can set a [[Context of Interoperability]] where for a given workshop, time period, project, etc. people can plug their tools together and work in a shared space without needing to make all of them anew - so for the simple example of this discord and this wiki, it should be possible to reuse this space to eg. connect to a different (or multiple) wikis, and vice versa to have a different discord connect to it. Along those lines, being able to have a synchronizing eg. git repository of the pages on the wiki so that people could edit them in obsidian or logseq or whatever their tool of choice is... this feels like an incredibly generic idea, so I feel like there must already be a ton of work on it, but it feels like it starts by just making a framework for bridging where the n-to-n problem is simplified by having a set of tools for auth and format translation and modeling documents and messages... I'm going to start sketching one piece of that with the [[Mediawiki-Git Bridge]], but I'm curious to hear if anyone either has any ideas, prior experience, or unmet needs that I might be orbiting around hereneeds that I might be orbiting around here)
- Context of Interoperability#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-14 20:37:50 + (in thinking about some of the problems fro … in thinking about some of the problems from this weekend like the (affectionately titled) [[The Google Docs Problem]] and various other interface problems with the wiki, where it'll always be easier for people to interact with a system from something they're more used to using, I've been thinking about a more generalized kind of bridging where one can set a [[Context of Interoperability]] where for a given workshop, time period, project, etc. people can plug their tools together and work in a shared space without needing to make all of them anew - so for the simple example of this discord and this wiki, it should be possible to reuse this space to eg. connect to a different (or multiple) wikis, and vice versa to have a different discord connect to it. Along those lines, being able to have a synchronizing eg. git repository of the pages on the wiki so that people could edit them in obsidian or logseq or whatever their tool of choice is... this feels like an incredibly generic idea, so I feel like there must already be a ton of work on it, but it feels like it starts by just making a framework for bridging where the n-to-n problem is simplified by having a set of tools for auth and format translation and modeling documents and messages... I'm going to start sketching one piece of that with the [[Mediawiki-Git Bridge]], but I'm curious to hear if anyone either has any ideas, prior experience, or unmet needs that I might be orbiting around hereneeds that I might be orbiting around here)
- The Google Docs Problem#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-14 20:37:50 + (in thinking about some of the problems fro … in thinking about some of the problems from this weekend like the (affectionately titled) [[The Google Docs Problem]] and various other interface problems with the wiki, where it'll always be easier for people to interact with a system from something they're more used to using, I've been thinking about a more generalized kind of bridging where one can set a [[Context of Interoperability]] where for a given workshop, time period, project, etc. people can plug their tools together and work in a shared space without needing to make all of them anew - so for the simple example of this discord and this wiki, it should be possible to reuse this space to eg. connect to a different (or multiple) wikis, and vice versa to have a different discord connect to it. Along those lines, being able to have a synchronizing eg. git repository of the pages on the wiki so that people could edit them in obsidian or logseq or whatever their tool of choice is... this feels like an incredibly generic idea, so I feel like there must already be a ton of work on it, but it feels like it starts by just making a framework for bridging where the n-to-n problem is simplified by having a set of tools for auth and format translation and modeling documents and messages... I'm going to start sketching one piece of that with the [[Mediawiki-Git Bridge]], but I'm curious to hear if anyone either has any ideas, prior experience, or unmet needs that I might be orbiting around hereneeds that I might be orbiting around here)
- Discord Messages#joelchan86-22-11-12 17:35:29 + (let's dump into a page! [[Discourse graphs within survey reading course]])
- Discourse graphs within survey reading course#joelchan86-22-11-12 17:35:29 + (let's dump into a page! [[Discourse graphs within survey reading course]])
- Discord Messages#joelchan86-22-11-13 03:34:58 + (my examples are more the latter. there ar … my examples are more the latter.</br></br>there are also strong roots in this idea of [[Infrastructure]] in CSCW, studying lots of attempts to get scientists to adopt new infrastructure and why they... didn't work.</br></br>one challenge is the [[Claim]] that "infrastructures often fail because of the inertia of the installed base" (existing software, workflows, norms, institutions, legal codes, etc.)</br></br>one decent entry point [[Source]] on this:</br>Information Infrastructures and the Challenge of the Installed Basees and the Challenge of the Installed Base)
- Source#joelchan86-22-11-13 03:34:58 + (my examples are more the latter. there ar … my examples are more the latter.</br></br>there are also strong roots in this idea of [[Infrastructure]] in CSCW, studying lots of attempts to get scientists to adopt new infrastructure and why they... didn't work.</br></br>one challenge is the [[Claim]] that "infrastructures often fail because of the inertia of the installed base" (existing software, workflows, norms, institutions, legal codes, etc.)</br></br>one decent entry point [[Source]] on this:</br>Information Infrastructures and the Challenge of the Installed Basees and the Challenge of the Installed Base)
- Claim#joelchan86-22-11-13 03:34:58 + (my examples are more the latter. there ar … my examples are more the latter.</br></br>there are also strong roots in this idea of [[Infrastructure]] in CSCW, studying lots of attempts to get scientists to adopt new infrastructure and why they... didn't work.</br></br>one challenge is the [[Claim]] that "infrastructures often fail because of the inertia of the installed base" (existing software, workflows, norms, institutions, legal codes, etc.)</br></br>one decent entry point [[Source]] on this:</br>Information Infrastructures and the Challenge of the Installed Basees and the Challenge of the Installed Base)
- Infrastructure#joelchan86-22-11-13 03:34:58 + (my examples are more the latter. there ar … my examples are more the latter.</br></br>there are also strong roots in this idea of [[Infrastructure]] in CSCW, studying lots of attempts to get scientists to adopt new infrastructure and why they... didn't work.</br></br>one challenge is the [[Claim]] that "infrastructures often fail because of the inertia of the installed base" (existing software, workflows, norms, institutions, legal codes, etc.)</br></br>one decent entry point [[Source]] on this:</br>Information Infrastructures and the Challenge of the Installed Basees and the Challenge of the Installed Base)
- WikiBot#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-02 08:14:45 + (omg lmao [[WikiBot#TODO]] Don't make a separate page using semantic wikilinks lol)
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-02 08:14:45 + (omg lmao [[WikiBot#TODO]] Don't make a separate page using semantic wikilinks lol)
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-11 23:05:02 + (super glad to hear that the endpoint worke … super glad to hear that the endpoint worked btw, i've never used SPARQL and am more used to just making my own data models that generate API queries & parse etc. so I would love to see what you've been doing and how you've been using it - I'll make a [[SPARQL]] page linked off the wiki page that gives the URL and maybe we can embed sample queries and etc. thereybe we can embed sample queries and etc. there)
- SPARQL#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-11 23:05:02 + (super glad to hear that the endpoint worke … super glad to hear that the endpoint worked btw, i've never used SPARQL and am more used to just making my own data models that generate API queries & parse etc. so I would love to see what you've been doing and how you've been using it - I'll make a [[SPARQL]] page linked off the wiki page that gives the URL and maybe we can embed sample queries and etc. thereybe we can embed sample queries and etc. there)
- Meta#Flancian-22-11-13 15:10:56 + (thank you! [[meta]] why zoom instead of something like [[jitsi]])
- Jitsi#Flancian-22-11-13 15:10:56 + (thank you! [[meta]] why zoom instead of something like [[jitsi]])
- Discord Messages#Flancian-22-11-13 15:10:56 + (thank you! [[meta]] why zoom instead of something like [[jitsi]])
- Discord Messages#joelchan86-22-11-10 15:51:29 + (the idea [[DiscourseGraphs]] is rooted in a bunch of models like [[SEPIO]] (h/t <@602622661125996545>) and [[ScholOnto]] that have been around for various amounts of time, though not yet with (to my knowledge) serious widespread adoption.)
- ScholOnto#joelchan86-22-11-10 15:51:29 + (the idea [[DiscourseGraphs]] is rooted in a bunch of models like [[SEPIO]] (h/t <@602622661125996545>) and [[ScholOnto]] that have been around for various amounts of time, though not yet with (to my knowledge) serious widespread adoption.)
- SEPIO#joelchan86-22-11-10 15:51:29 + (the idea [[DiscourseGraphs]] is rooted in a bunch of models like [[SEPIO]] (h/t <@602622661125996545>) and [[ScholOnto]] that have been around for various amounts of time, though not yet with (to my knowledge) serious widespread adoption.)
- DiscourseGraphs#joelchan86-22-11-10 15:51:29 + (the idea [[DiscourseGraphs]] is rooted in a bunch of models like [[SEPIO]] (h/t <@602622661125996545>) and [[ScholOnto]] that have been around for various amounts of time, though not yet with (to my knowledge) serious widespread adoption.)
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-04 21:01:30 + (the idea is exactly to merge the [[Garden and Stream]] … the idea is exactly to merge the [[Garden and Stream]] we have here, or as olde wiki culture called it, [[DocumentMode and ThreadMode]] in a process of [[Gradual Enrichment]]</br>http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/DocumentMode</br>http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/ThreadModede http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/ThreadMode)
- Gradual Enrichment#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-04 21:01:30 + (the idea is exactly to merge the [[Garden and Stream]] … the idea is exactly to merge the [[Garden and Stream]] we have here, or as olde wiki culture called it, [[DocumentMode and ThreadMode]] in a process of [[Gradual Enrichment]]</br>http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/DocumentMode</br>http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/ThreadModede http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/ThreadMode)
- Garden and Stream#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-04 21:01:30 + (the idea is exactly to merge the [[Garden and Stream]] … the idea is exactly to merge the [[Garden and Stream]] we have here, or as olde wiki culture called it, [[DocumentMode and ThreadMode]] in a process of [[Gradual Enrichment]]</br>http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/DocumentMode</br>http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/ThreadModede http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/ThreadMode)
- DocumentMode and ThreadMode#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-04 21:01:30 + (the idea is exactly to merge the [[Garden and Stream]] … the idea is exactly to merge the [[Garden and Stream]] we have here, or as olde wiki culture called it, [[DocumentMode and ThreadMode]] in a process of [[Gradual Enrichment]]</br>http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/DocumentMode</br>http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/ThreadModede http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/ThreadMode)
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-03 11:27:24 + (this is almost exactly the idea with the [[WikiBot]] … this is almost exactly the idea with the [[WikiBot]] that pushes to a [[Semantic Wiki]], and good to have a name in [[Gradual Enrichment]]. looking forward to digging though the references and finishing that piece^ tomorrow. (and finishing the n-back linking syntax so I can just directly include the piece in the annotation that is this message). thanks for sharing 🙂hat is this message). thanks for sharing 🙂)
- WikiBot#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-03 11:27:24 + (this is almost exactly the idea with the [[WikiBot]] … this is almost exactly the idea with the [[WikiBot]] that pushes to a [[Semantic Wiki]], and good to have a name in [[Gradual Enrichment]]. looking forward to digging though the references and finishing that piece^ tomorrow. (and finishing the n-back linking syntax so I can just directly include the piece in the annotation that is this message). thanks for sharing 🙂hat is this message). thanks for sharing 🙂)
- Semantic Wiki#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-03 11:27:24 + (this is almost exactly the idea with the [[WikiBot]] … this is almost exactly the idea with the [[WikiBot]] that pushes to a [[Semantic Wiki]], and good to have a name in [[Gradual Enrichment]]. looking forward to digging though the references and finishing that piece^ tomorrow. (and finishing the n-back linking syntax so I can just directly include the piece in the annotation that is this message). thanks for sharing 🙂hat is this message). thanks for sharing 🙂)
- Gradual Enrichment#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-03 11:27:24 + (this is almost exactly the idea with the [[WikiBot]] … this is almost exactly the idea with the [[WikiBot]] that pushes to a [[Semantic Wiki]], and good to have a name in [[Gradual Enrichment]]. looking forward to digging though the references and finishing that piece^ tomorrow. (and finishing the n-back linking syntax so I can just directly include the piece in the annotation that is this message). thanks for sharing 🙂hat is this message). thanks for sharing 🙂)
- WikiBot#Wutbot-22-11-12 11:22:37 + (those brackets cue the [[WikiBot]] to link the message to the wiki page containing the mentioned terms)
- Discord Messages#Wutbot-22-11-12 11:22:37 + (those brackets cue the [[WikiBot]] to link the message to the wiki page containing the mentioned terms)
- Discord Messages#joelchan86-22-11-10 15:55:39 + (we think the problem now is user-friendly … we think the problem now is user-friendly tools and workfows that can create discourse graph structures, and have seen some exciting progress across a bunch of new user-facing "personal wikis". but bridging from personal to communal is still a challenge, partially bc of tooling.</br></br>this is why i'm excited about the [[Discourse Modeling]] idea, which i sort of understand as a way to try to instantiate something like [[Discourse Graphs]] into a wiki (bc wikis have a lot more in-built affordances for collaboration, such as edit histories, talk pages, etc.), which may hopefully lead to a lower barrier to entry for collaborative discourse graphing.</br></br>a high hope is that we can develop a process that is easy enough to understand and implement that can then be applied to discourse graphing the IPCC or similarly large body of research on a focused, contentious, interdisciplinary topic.</br></br>other examples include:</br>- effects of masks on community transmission (can't do decisive RCTs, need to synthesize)</br>- effects of social media on political (dys)function: (existing crowdsourced lit review here, in traditional narrative form: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vVAtMCQnz8WVxtSNQev_e1cGmY9rnY96ecYuAj6C548/edit#)z8WVxtSNQev_e1cGmY9rnY96ecYuAj6C548/edit#))
- Discourse Graphs#joelchan86-22-11-10 15:55:39 + (we think the problem now is user-friendly … we think the problem now is user-friendly tools and workfows that can create discourse graph structures, and have seen some exciting progress across a bunch of new user-facing "personal wikis". but bridging from personal to communal is still a challenge, partially bc of tooling.</br></br>this is why i'm excited about the [[Discourse Modeling]] idea, which i sort of understand as a way to try to instantiate something like [[Discourse Graphs]] into a wiki (bc wikis have a lot more in-built affordances for collaboration, such as edit histories, talk pages, etc.), which may hopefully lead to a lower barrier to entry for collaborative discourse graphing.</br></br>a high hope is that we can develop a process that is easy enough to understand and implement that can then be applied to discourse graphing the IPCC or similarly large body of research on a focused, contentious, interdisciplinary topic.</br></br>other examples include:</br>- effects of masks on community transmission (can't do decisive RCTs, need to synthesize)</br>- effects of social media on political (dys)function: (existing crowdsourced lit review here, in traditional narrative form: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vVAtMCQnz8WVxtSNQev_e1cGmY9rnY96ecYuAj6C548/edit#)z8WVxtSNQev_e1cGmY9rnY96ecYuAj6C548/edit#))
- Discourse Modeling#joelchan86-22-11-10 15:55:39 + (we think the problem now is user-friendly … we think the problem now is user-friendly tools and workfows that can create discourse graph structures, and have seen some exciting progress across a bunch of new user-facing "personal wikis". but bridging from personal to communal is still a challenge, partially bc of tooling.</br></br>this is why i'm excited about the [[Discourse Modeling]] idea, which i sort of understand as a way to try to instantiate something like [[Discourse Graphs]] into a wiki (bc wikis have a lot more in-built affordances for collaboration, such as edit histories, talk pages, etc.), which may hopefully lead to a lower barrier to entry for collaborative discourse graphing.</br></br>a high hope is that we can develop a process that is easy enough to understand and implement that can then be applied to discourse graphing the IPCC or similarly large body of research on a focused, contentious, interdisciplinary topic.</br></br>other examples include:</br>- effects of masks on community transmission (can't do decisive RCTs, need to synthesize)</br>- effects of social media on political (dys)function: (existing crowdsourced lit review here, in traditional narrative form: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vVAtMCQnz8WVxtSNQev_e1cGmY9rnY96ecYuAj6C548/edit#)z8WVxtSNQev_e1cGmY9rnY96ecYuAj6C548/edit#))
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-11 06:50:07 + (we're in the process of consolidating the … we're in the process of consolidating the ideas into group pages, so far the group pages are incomplete, but tomorrow (I'm on Pacific time, US) will work on that and take whatever ya write and move it over there 🙂 <@322545403876868096> got this started here: https://synthesis-infrastructures.wiki/Workshop_Working_Groups and then we'll split those up into pages in [[:Category:Group]]Category:Group]])
- Category:Group#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-11 06:50:07 + (we're in the process of consolidating the … we're in the process of consolidating the ideas into group pages, so far the group pages are incomplete, but tomorrow (I'm on Pacific time, US) will work on that and take whatever ya write and move it over there 🙂 <@322545403876868096> got this started here: https://synthesis-infrastructures.wiki/Workshop_Working_Groups and then we'll split those up into pages in [[Category:Group]]ategory:Group]])
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-10 20:58:52 + (yes [[anagora]] does have a rough kind of federation! it's a very very permissive model which I love, markdown and plaintext with wikilinks, a lot of the wikis that it federates with are just git repositories of .md files 🙂)
- Anagora#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-10 20:58:52 + (yes [[anagora]] does have a rough kind of federation! it's a very very permissive model which I love, markdown and plaintext with wikilinks, a lot of the wikis that it federates with are just git repositories of .md files 🙂)