Search by property
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Source#joelchan86-22-11-13 03:44:39 + ([[Source]] for the figure in the previous msg: https://assets.pubpub.org/5nv701md/01521405455055.pdf)
- Testing Wikibot2#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-02 07:43:07 + ([[Testing Wikibot2]])
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-02 07:43:07 + ([[Testing Wikibot2]])
- Testing Wikibot#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-02 07:43:01 + ([[Testing Wikibot]])
- Testing Wikibot#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-01 02:02:02 + ([[Testing Wikibot]])
- Testing Wikibot#sneakers-the-rat-22-10-31 23:55:22 + ([[Testing Wikibot]])
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-02 07:43:01 + ([[Testing Wikibot]])
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-01 02:02:02 + ([[Testing Wikibot]])
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-10-31 23:55:22 + ([[Testing Wikibot]])
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-05 01:23:44 + ([[Wiki#Organization]] As we get towards pr … [[Wiki#Organization]]</br>As we get towards proposing projects and organizing ideas, I've added a set of pages for the different concepts that y'all indicated either here or in your applications: https://synthesis-infrastructures.wiki/Concepts</br></br>Each page should give a list of participants that have a `Interested In` property on their participant page (or you can declare interest on the page using the template (see example at https://synthesis-infrastructures.wiki/Template:Concept ) as another way of finding people with similar interests. Feel free to add additional interests from your own page and add new pages by using the `</br>{| style="width: 30em; font-size: 90%; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; background-color: #f9f9f9; color: black; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-right: 1em; padding: 0.2em;text-align:left;float:right;clear:right;"</br>! style="text-align: center; background-color:#ccccff;" colspan="2" |<span style="font-size: larger;">Discord Messages</span></br>|-</br>| Interested Participants || </br>|}</br>[[Category:Concept]]</br></br></br>` template on any new page. The pages are all stubs at the moment, but I have made links between related concepts/subconcepts/etc. These will also help us catch any wikilinks made from within the discord 🙂 us catch any wikilinks made from within the discord 🙂)
- Wiki#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-05 01:23:44 + ([[Wiki#Organization]] As we get towards pr … [[Wiki#Organization]]</br>As we get towards proposing projects and organizing ideas, I've added a set of pages for the different concepts that y'all indicated either here or in your applications: https://synthesis-infrastructures.wiki/Concepts</br></br>Each page should give a list of participants that have a `Interested In` property on their participant page (or you can declare interest on the page using the template (see example at https://synthesis-infrastructures.wiki/Template:Concept ) as another way of finding people with similar interests. Feel free to add additional interests from your own page and add new pages by using the `</br>{| style="width: 30em; font-size: 90%; border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; background-color: #f9f9f9; color: black; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-right: 1em; padding: 0.2em;text-align:left;float:right;clear:right;"</br>! style="text-align: center; background-color:#ccccff;" colspan="2" |<span style="font-size: larger;">Wiki</span></br>|-</br>| Interested Participants || </br>|}</br>[[Category:Concept]]</br></br></br>` template on any new page. The pages are all stubs at the moment, but I have made links between related concepts/subconcepts/etc. These will also help us catch any wikilinks made from within the discord 🙂 us catch any wikilinks made from within the discord 🙂)
- Discord Messages#Wutbot-22-11-23 18:59:16 + ([[claim]] claims and questions dominate in … [[claim]] claims and questions dominate in natural conversation; the imbalance of sources & evidence is quite stark. This aligns with my mental model of *conversational charity*, where we assume our interlocutors *could* ground their statements in evidence if pressed, but skip this step in the interest of time., but skip this step in the interest of time.)
- Claim#Wutbot-22-11-23 18:59:16 + ([[claim]] claims and questions dominate in … [[claim]] claims and questions dominate in natural conversation; the imbalance of sources & evidence is quite stark. This aligns with my mental model of *conversational charity*, where we assume our interlocutors *could* ground their statements in evidence if pressed, but skip this step in the interest of time., but skip this step in the interest of time.)
- Discord Messages#Flancian-22-11-13 15:09:48 + ([[joel chan]] -> [[decentralized discourse graph]])
- Decentralized discourse graph#Flancian-22-11-13 15:09:48 + ([[joel chan]] -> [[decentralized discourse graph]])
- Joel chan#Flancian-22-11-13 15:09:48 + ([[joel chan]] -> [[decentralized discourse graph]])
- Discord Messages#joelchan86-22-11-13 03:43:07 + (a bit further afield, i'd point to the [[Open Science Framework]] … a bit further afield, i'd point to the [[Open Science Framework]] as a thoughtful case study in incentive mechanism design focused on integration into *intrinsic* benefits (i'm more thoughtful about my science, i can easily document things so i don't forget them)</br></br>this podcast interview is a decent look into how he thinks about things: https://everythinghertz.com/69</br></br>if i read him right, i sort of agree that infrastructure (possibility) an usability and communities (norms) are prior to / foundational to incentives and policy. top-down incentives and policies that don't align with existing norms and usable practices may risk incentivizing 'just comply with it' practices or just fall flat, like some data sharing mandates.all flat, like some data sharing mandates.)
- Open Science Framework#joelchan86-22-11-13 03:43:07 + (a bit further afield, i'd point to the [[Open Science Framework]] … a bit further afield, i'd point to the [[Open Science Framework]] as a thoughtful case study in incentive mechanism design focused on integration into *intrinsic* benefits (i'm more thoughtful about my science, i can easily document things so i don't forget them)</br></br>this podcast interview is a decent look into how he thinks about things: https://everythinghertz.com/69</br></br>if i read him right, i sort of agree that infrastructure (possibility) an usability and communities (norms) are prior to / foundational to incentives and policy. top-down incentives and policies that don't align with existing norms and usable practices may risk incentivizing 'just comply with it' practices or just fall flat, like some data sharing mandates.all flat, like some data sharing mandates.)
- ScholOnto#joelchan86-22-11-03 02:56:36 + (ah, that is both informative and sad to he … ah, that is both informative and sad to hear. i think ahead of its time is a reasonable diagnosis.</br></br>[[ScholOnto]] I think was also ahead of its time: had a working prototype integration into a Word processor for directly authoring discourse-graph like things while drafting a manuscript (described here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/int.20188)brary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/int.20188))
- Discord Messages#joelchan86-22-11-03 02:56:36 + (ah, that is both informative and sad to he … ah, that is both informative and sad to hear. i think ahead of its time is a reasonable diagnosis.</br></br>[[ScholOnto]] I think was also ahead of its time: had a working prototype integration into a Word processor for directly authoring discourse-graph like things while drafting a manuscript (described here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/int.20188)brary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/int.20188))
- Discord Messages#joelchan86-22-11-13 03:36:24 + (another classic [[Source]] on [[Infrastructure]] is Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces)
- Worm Community System (WCS)#joelchan86-22-11-13 03:36:24 + (another classic [[Source]] on [[Infrastructure]] is Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces)
- Infrastructure#joelchan86-22-11-13 03:36:24 + (another classic [[Source]] on [[Infrastructure]] is Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces)
- Source#joelchan86-22-11-13 03:36:24 + (another classic [[Source]] on [[Infrastructure]] is Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces)
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-10 21:38:12 + (another group ( <#1038988750677606432&g … another group ( <#1038988750677606432> ) will i believe be analyzing the semantic information on the wiki ( https://synthesis-infrastructures.wiki/Main_Page ), and you can archive the text of any message onto a wiki page by using [[Wikilinks]]: ( so eg. this message will go to https://synthesis-infrastructures.wiki/Wikilinks )tps://synthesis-infrastructures.wiki/Wikilinks ))
- Wikilinks#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-10 21:38:12 + (another group ( <#1038988750677606432&g … another group ( <#1038988750677606432> ) will i believe be analyzing the semantic information on the wiki ( https://synthesis-infrastructures.wiki/Main_Page ), and you can archive the text of any message onto a wiki page by using [[Wikilinks]]: ( so eg. this message will go to https://synthesis-infrastructures.wiki/Wikilinks )tps://synthesis-infrastructures.wiki/Wikilinks ))
- Discord Messages#Flancian-22-11-13 16:06:41 + (apologies I didn't make it to [[discourse modeling]]!)
- Discourse modeling#Flancian-22-11-13 16:06:41 + (apologies I didn't make it to [[discourse modeling]]!)
- DIY Algorithms#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-20 10:34:44 + (check this out. [[DIY Algorithms]] … check this out. [[DIY Algorithms]]. instead of adding accounts to lists and autopopulating, you can directly add posts themselves. so then you can rig up whatever the frick algorithm you want to masto:</br> https://social.coop/@jonny/109545449455062668</br>https://github.com/sneakers-the-rat/mastodon/tree/feature/postlistsrs-the-rat/mastodon/tree/feature/postlists)
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-12-20 10:34:44 + (check this out. [[DIY Algorithms]] … check this out. [[DIY Algorithms]]. instead of adding accounts to lists and autopopulating, you can directly add posts themselves. so then you can rig up whatever the frick algorithm you want to masto:</br> https://social.coop/@jonny/109545449455062668</br>https://github.com/sneakers-the-rat/mastodon/tree/feature/postlistsrs-the-rat/mastodon/tree/feature/postlists)
- Garden and Stream#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-14 04:21:58 + (encouraging the use of the thread for the … encouraging the use of the thread for the sake of people's notifications as we enter slow-mode. </br></br>sidebar: this to me is one of the more interesting uses of this kind of wiki-bot, in a more long-lived chat and communication medium (glad 2 have <@708787219992805407> here for the long-timescales perspective btw). in both this and any future workshops, being able to plug in something like a wikibot that can let different threads get tagged to common concepts through time to different/overlapping discord servers and output to potentially multiple overlapping wikis is v interesting to me.</br></br> I'm gonna continue to make it easier to deploy because i feel like the [[Garden and Stream]] metaphor is one that can unfold on multiple timescales, and it would be cool to build out the ability to make that easier: how cool would it be if you didn't have to decide on a chat/document medium or have to make a new set at the start of an organizing project since it was arbitrary anyway and your infra supported use and crossposting across many media. </br></br>Eg. the very understanding surfacing of [[The Google Docs Problem]] because of [[Mediawiki]]'s lack of [[Synchronous Editing]] [[Live Editing]] and the need to remember to link out to external services rather than that being a natural expectation of a multimodal group and having systems that explicitly support that is illustrative to me. Maybe one description is being able to deploy a [[Context of Interoperability]] [[Interoperability]]: during this time period I am intending these documents/discord servers/hashtags/social media accounts/etc. to be able to crosspost between each other so that everyone needs to to as little as possible to make their workflows alignlittle as possible to make their workflows align)
- The Google Docs Problem#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-14 04:21:58 + (encouraging the use of the thread for the … encouraging the use of the thread for the sake of people's notifications as we enter slow-mode. </br></br>sidebar: this to me is one of the more interesting uses of this kind of wiki-bot, in a more long-lived chat and communication medium (glad 2 have <@708787219992805407> here for the long-timescales perspective btw). in both this and any future workshops, being able to plug in something like a wikibot that can let different threads get tagged to common concepts through time to different/overlapping discord servers and output to potentially multiple overlapping wikis is v interesting to me.</br></br> I'm gonna continue to make it easier to deploy because i feel like the [[Garden and Stream]] metaphor is one that can unfold on multiple timescales, and it would be cool to build out the ability to make that easier: how cool would it be if you didn't have to decide on a chat/document medium or have to make a new set at the start of an organizing project since it was arbitrary anyway and your infra supported use and crossposting across many media. </br></br>Eg. the very understanding surfacing of [[The Google Docs Problem]] because of [[Mediawiki]]'s lack of [[Synchronous Editing]] [[Live Editing]] and the need to remember to link out to external services rather than that being a natural expectation of a multimodal group and having systems that explicitly support that is illustrative to me. Maybe one description is being able to deploy a [[Context of Interoperability]] [[Interoperability]]: during this time period I am intending these documents/discord servers/hashtags/social media accounts/etc. to be able to crosspost between each other so that everyone needs to to as little as possible to make their workflows alignlittle as possible to make their workflows align)
- Mediawiki#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-14 04:21:58 + (encouraging the use of the thread for the … encouraging the use of the thread for the sake of people's notifications as we enter slow-mode. </br></br>sidebar: this to me is one of the more interesting uses of this kind of wiki-bot, in a more long-lived chat and communication medium (glad 2 have <@708787219992805407> here for the long-timescales perspective btw). in both this and any future workshops, being able to plug in something like a wikibot that can let different threads get tagged to common concepts through time to different/overlapping discord servers and output to potentially multiple overlapping wikis is v interesting to me.</br></br> I'm gonna continue to make it easier to deploy because i feel like the [[Garden and Stream]] metaphor is one that can unfold on multiple timescales, and it would be cool to build out the ability to make that easier: how cool would it be if you didn't have to decide on a chat/document medium or have to make a new set at the start of an organizing project since it was arbitrary anyway and your infra supported use and crossposting across many media. </br></br>Eg. the very understanding surfacing of [[The Google Docs Problem]] because of [[Mediawiki]]'s lack of [[Synchronous Editing]] [[Live Editing]] and the need to remember to link out to external services rather than that being a natural expectation of a multimodal group and having systems that explicitly support that is illustrative to me. Maybe one description is being able to deploy a [[Context of Interoperability]] [[Interoperability]]: during this time period I am intending these documents/discord servers/hashtags/social media accounts/etc. to be able to crosspost between each other so that everyone needs to to as little as possible to make their workflows alignlittle as possible to make their workflows align)
- Synchronous Editing#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-14 04:21:58 + (encouraging the use of the thread for the … encouraging the use of the thread for the sake of people's notifications as we enter slow-mode. </br></br>sidebar: this to me is one of the more interesting uses of this kind of wiki-bot, in a more long-lived chat and communication medium (glad 2 have <@708787219992805407> here for the long-timescales perspective btw). in both this and any future workshops, being able to plug in something like a wikibot that can let different threads get tagged to common concepts through time to different/overlapping discord servers and output to potentially multiple overlapping wikis is v interesting to me.</br></br> I'm gonna continue to make it easier to deploy because i feel like the [[Garden and Stream]] metaphor is one that can unfold on multiple timescales, and it would be cool to build out the ability to make that easier: how cool would it be if you didn't have to decide on a chat/document medium or have to make a new set at the start of an organizing project since it was arbitrary anyway and your infra supported use and crossposting across many media. </br></br>Eg. the very understanding surfacing of [[The Google Docs Problem]] because of [[Mediawiki]]'s lack of [[Synchronous Editing]] [[Live Editing]] and the need to remember to link out to external services rather than that being a natural expectation of a multimodal group and having systems that explicitly support that is illustrative to me. Maybe one description is being able to deploy a [[Context of Interoperability]] [[Interoperability]]: during this time period I am intending these documents/discord servers/hashtags/social media accounts/etc. to be able to crosspost between each other so that everyone needs to to as little as possible to make their workflows alignlittle as possible to make their workflows align)
- Live Editing#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-14 04:21:58 + (encouraging the use of the thread for the … encouraging the use of the thread for the sake of people's notifications as we enter slow-mode. </br></br>sidebar: this to me is one of the more interesting uses of this kind of wiki-bot, in a more long-lived chat and communication medium (glad 2 have <@708787219992805407> here for the long-timescales perspective btw). in both this and any future workshops, being able to plug in something like a wikibot that can let different threads get tagged to common concepts through time to different/overlapping discord servers and output to potentially multiple overlapping wikis is v interesting to me.</br></br> I'm gonna continue to make it easier to deploy because i feel like the [[Garden and Stream]] metaphor is one that can unfold on multiple timescales, and it would be cool to build out the ability to make that easier: how cool would it be if you didn't have to decide on a chat/document medium or have to make a new set at the start of an organizing project since it was arbitrary anyway and your infra supported use and crossposting across many media. </br></br>Eg. the very understanding surfacing of [[The Google Docs Problem]] because of [[Mediawiki]]'s lack of [[Synchronous Editing]] [[Live Editing]] and the need to remember to link out to external services rather than that being a natural expectation of a multimodal group and having systems that explicitly support that is illustrative to me. Maybe one description is being able to deploy a [[Context of Interoperability]] [[Interoperability]]: during this time period I am intending these documents/discord servers/hashtags/social media accounts/etc. to be able to crosspost between each other so that everyone needs to to as little as possible to make their workflows alignlittle as possible to make their workflows align)
- Context of Interoperability#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-14 04:21:58 + (encouraging the use of the thread for the … encouraging the use of the thread for the sake of people's notifications as we enter slow-mode. </br></br>sidebar: this to me is one of the more interesting uses of this kind of wiki-bot, in a more long-lived chat and communication medium (glad 2 have <@708787219992805407> here for the long-timescales perspective btw). in both this and any future workshops, being able to plug in something like a wikibot that can let different threads get tagged to common concepts through time to different/overlapping discord servers and output to potentially multiple overlapping wikis is v interesting to me.</br></br> I'm gonna continue to make it easier to deploy because i feel like the [[Garden and Stream]] metaphor is one that can unfold on multiple timescales, and it would be cool to build out the ability to make that easier: how cool would it be if you didn't have to decide on a chat/document medium or have to make a new set at the start of an organizing project since it was arbitrary anyway and your infra supported use and crossposting across many media. </br></br>Eg. the very understanding surfacing of [[The Google Docs Problem]] because of [[Mediawiki]]'s lack of [[Synchronous Editing]] [[Live Editing]] and the need to remember to link out to external services rather than that being a natural expectation of a multimodal group and having systems that explicitly support that is illustrative to me. Maybe one description is being able to deploy a [[Context of Interoperability]] [[Interoperability]]: during this time period I am intending these documents/discord servers/hashtags/social media accounts/etc. to be able to crosspost between each other so that everyone needs to to as little as possible to make their workflows alignlittle as possible to make their workflows align)
- Interoperability#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-14 04:21:58 + (encouraging the use of the thread for the … encouraging the use of the thread for the sake of people's notifications as we enter slow-mode. </br></br>sidebar: this to me is one of the more interesting uses of this kind of wiki-bot, in a more long-lived chat and communication medium (glad 2 have <@708787219992805407> here for the long-timescales perspective btw). in both this and any future workshops, being able to plug in something like a wikibot that can let different threads get tagged to common concepts through time to different/overlapping discord servers and output to potentially multiple overlapping wikis is v interesting to me.</br></br> I'm gonna continue to make it easier to deploy because i feel like the [[Garden and Stream]] metaphor is one that can unfold on multiple timescales, and it would be cool to build out the ability to make that easier: how cool would it be if you didn't have to decide on a chat/document medium or have to make a new set at the start of an organizing project since it was arbitrary anyway and your infra supported use and crossposting across many media. </br></br>Eg. the very understanding surfacing of [[The Google Docs Problem]] because of [[Mediawiki]]'s lack of [[Synchronous Editing]] [[Live Editing]] and the need to remember to link out to external services rather than that being a natural expectation of a multimodal group and having systems that explicitly support that is illustrative to me. Maybe one description is being able to deploy a [[Context of Interoperability]] [[Interoperability]]: during this time period I am intending these documents/discord servers/hashtags/social media accounts/etc. to be able to crosspost between each other so that everyone needs to to as little as possible to make their workflows alignlittle as possible to make their workflows align)
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-14 04:21:58 + (encouraging the use of the thread for the … encouraging the use of the thread for the sake of people's notifications as we enter slow-mode. </br></br>sidebar: this to me is one of the more interesting uses of this kind of wiki-bot, in a more long-lived chat and communication medium (glad 2 have <@708787219992805407> here for the long-timescales perspective btw). in both this and any future workshops, being able to plug in something like a wikibot that can let different threads get tagged to common concepts through time to different/overlapping discord servers and output to potentially multiple overlapping wikis is v interesting to me.</br></br> I'm gonna continue to make it easier to deploy because i feel like the [[Garden and Stream]] metaphor is one that can unfold on multiple timescales, and it would be cool to build out the ability to make that easier: how cool would it be if you didn't have to decide on a chat/document medium or have to make a new set at the start of an organizing project since it was arbitrary anyway and your infra supported use and crossposting across many media. </br></br>Eg. the very understanding surfacing of [[The Google Docs Problem]] because of [[Mediawiki]]'s lack of [[Synchronous Editing]] [[Live Editing]] and the need to remember to link out to external services rather than that being a natural expectation of a multimodal group and having systems that explicitly support that is illustrative to me. Maybe one description is being able to deploy a [[Context of Interoperability]] [[Interoperability]]: during this time period I am intending these documents/discord servers/hashtags/social media accounts/etc. to be able to crosspost between each other so that everyone needs to to as little as possible to make their workflows alignlittle as possible to make their workflows align)
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-03 23:11:44 + (hello Matthew! very curious about this. As … hello Matthew! very curious about this. As someone not familiar with materials science, I'm curious if you could say more about what [[OPTIMADE]] does in this case? Is the idea that the zenodo plugin parses some paper, and then sends it to other listening clients that the parsed data comes from the paper? is it a vocabulary, or communication protocol, or both? and what kind of information would it be parsing/do materials scientists want to be able to analyze in an automated way? sorry if I am being dense, just curious because I've always admired materials but have had very little exposure.terials but have had very little exposure.)
- OPTIMADE#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-03 23:11:44 + (hello Matthew! very curious about this. As … hello Matthew! very curious about this. As someone not familiar with materials science, I'm curious if you could say more about what [[OPTIMADE]] does in this case? Is the idea that the zenodo plugin parses some paper, and then sends it to other listening clients that the parsed data comes from the paper? is it a vocabulary, or communication protocol, or both? and what kind of information would it be parsing/do materials scientists want to be able to analyze in an automated way? sorry if I am being dense, just curious because I've always admired materials but have had very little exposure.terials but have had very little exposure.)
- ...#joelchan86-22-11-12 17:53:19 + (hi peter, yes, the `[[...]]` (wikilinks) syntax has been quite widely adopted, spread from wikis!)
- Discord Messages#joelchan86-22-11-12 17:53:19 + (hi peter, yes, the `[[...]]` (wikilinks) syntax has been quite widely adopted, spread from wikis!)
- Claim#joelchan86-22-11-11 19:01:10 + (i agree it's not universal! my feeling is … i agree it's not universal! my feeling is that [[Claim]]: a statement (claim or evidence) might be the more universal element:</br>- empirical work also consists of statements about the world (this is less controversial)</br>- design/technological innovation rests in part on claims about a) what is needed in the world, what is hard to do, constraints, and b) what is needed to succeed: examples here: https://deepscienceventures.com/content/the-outcomes-graph-2 (h/t <@559775193242009610>)</br>- theories often consist of systems of core claims (e.g., in models like what <@824740026575355906> and <@734802666441408532> are working with, where we can think of the claims as subgraphs of the overall knowledge graph)</br></br>see, e.g., [[Evidence]] from this review of models of scientific knowledge https://publish.obsidian.md/joelchan-notes/discourse-graph/evidence/EVD+-+Four+positivist+epistemological+models+from+philosophy+of+science%2C+including+Popper%2C+emphasiz...+statements+as+a+core+component+of+scientific+knowledge+-+%40harsDesigningScientificKnowledge2001</br></br>and [[Evidence]] convergence/contrasts across users of the [[Roam Discourse Graph extension]] in terms of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidencems of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidence)
- Evidence#joelchan86-22-11-11 19:01:10 + (i agree it's not universal! my feeling is … i agree it's not universal! my feeling is that [[Claim]]: a statement (claim or evidence) might be the more universal element:</br>- empirical work also consists of statements about the world (this is less controversial)</br>- design/technological innovation rests in part on claims about a) what is needed in the world, what is hard to do, constraints, and b) what is needed to succeed: examples here: https://deepscienceventures.com/content/the-outcomes-graph-2 (h/t <@559775193242009610>)</br>- theories often consist of systems of core claims (e.g., in models like what <@824740026575355906> and <@734802666441408532> are working with, where we can think of the claims as subgraphs of the overall knowledge graph)</br></br>see, e.g., [[Evidence]] from this review of models of scientific knowledge https://publish.obsidian.md/joelchan-notes/discourse-graph/evidence/EVD+-+Four+positivist+epistemological+models+from+philosophy+of+science%2C+including+Popper%2C+emphasiz...+statements+as+a+core+component+of+scientific+knowledge+-+%40harsDesigningScientificKnowledge2001</br></br>and [[Evidence]] convergence/contrasts across users of the [[Roam Discourse Graph extension]] in terms of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidencems of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidence)
- Roam Discourse Graph extension#joelchan86-22-11-11 19:01:10 + (i agree it's not universal! my feeling is … i agree it's not universal! my feeling is that [[Claim]]: a statement (claim or evidence) might be the more universal element:</br>- empirical work also consists of statements about the world (this is less controversial)</br>- design/technological innovation rests in part on claims about a) what is needed in the world, what is hard to do, constraints, and b) what is needed to succeed: examples here: https://deepscienceventures.com/content/the-outcomes-graph-2 (h/t <@559775193242009610>)</br>- theories often consist of systems of core claims (e.g., in models like what <@824740026575355906> and <@734802666441408532> are working with, where we can think of the claims as subgraphs of the overall knowledge graph)</br></br>see, e.g., [[Evidence]] from this review of models of scientific knowledge https://publish.obsidian.md/joelchan-notes/discourse-graph/evidence/EVD+-+Four+positivist+epistemological+models+from+philosophy+of+science%2C+including+Popper%2C+emphasiz...+statements+as+a+core+component+of+scientific+knowledge+-+%40harsDesigningScientificKnowledge2001</br></br>and [[Evidence]] convergence/contrasts across users of the [[Roam Discourse Graph extension]] in terms of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidencems of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidence)
- Discord Messages#joelchan86-22-11-11 19:01:10 + (i agree it's not universal! my feeling is … i agree it's not universal! my feeling is that [[Claim]]: a statement (claim or evidence) might be the more universal element:</br>- empirical work also consists of statements about the world (this is less controversial)</br>- design/technological innovation rests in part on claims about a) what is needed in the world, what is hard to do, constraints, and b) what is needed to succeed: examples here: https://deepscienceventures.com/content/the-outcomes-graph-2 (h/t <@559775193242009610>)</br>- theories often consist of systems of core claims (e.g., in models like what <@824740026575355906> and <@734802666441408532> are working with, where we can think of the claims as subgraphs of the overall knowledge graph)</br></br>see, e.g., [[Evidence]] from this review of models of scientific knowledge https://publish.obsidian.md/joelchan-notes/discourse-graph/evidence/EVD+-+Four+positivist+epistemological+models+from+philosophy+of+science%2C+including+Popper%2C+emphasiz...+statements+as+a+core+component+of+scientific+knowledge+-+%40harsDesigningScientificKnowledge2001</br></br>and [[Evidence]] convergence/contrasts across users of the [[Roam Discourse Graph extension]] in terms of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidencems of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidence)
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-10-17 01:38:21 + (i'll leave the bot running for a lil bit but yeah it's just running on my laptop for now, will move it over to the linode running the wiki when i go to switch the url. made a page to document the [[WikiBot#Status Updates]])
- WikiBot#sneakers-the-rat-22-10-17 01:38:21 + (i'll leave the bot running for a lil bit but yeah it's just running on my laptop for now, will move it over to the linode running the wiki when i go to switch the url. made a page to document the [[WikiBot#Status Updates]])
- Reading List#joelchan86-22-11-10 21:38:25 + (in human-computer interaction we have a si … in human-computer interaction we have a similar problem of trying to think about and synthesize across many genres of contributions/research. one map (adapted for information studies) breaks things out into "empirical" contributions (these most often follow the standard intro/methods/results/discussion format), "conceptual" contributions (which are often more amorphous theory papers), and "constructive" contributions (making a new system/method)</br></br>from here: HCI Research as Problem-Solvingfrom here: HCI Research as Problem-Solving)
- Discord Messages#joelchan86-22-11-10 21:38:25 + (in human-computer interaction we have a si … in human-computer interaction we have a similar problem of trying to think about and synthesize across many genres of contributions/research. one map (adapted for information studies) breaks things out into "empirical" contributions (these most often follow the standard intro/methods/results/discussion format), "conceptual" contributions (which are often more amorphous theory papers), and "constructive" contributions (making a new system/method)</br></br>from here: HCI Research as Problem-Solvingfrom here: HCI Research as Problem-Solving)
- Discord Messages#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-04 15:26:31 + (in the spirit of cultivating our garden: [[Reading List]] https://hapgood.us/2015/10/17/the-garden-and-the-stream-a-technopastoral/amp/)
- Reading List#sneakers-the-rat-22-11-04 15:26:31 + (in the spirit of cultivating our garden: [[Reading List]] https://hapgood.us/2015/10/17/the-garden-and-the-stream-a-technopastoral/amp/)