982
edits
Claim: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→Discord: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
and [[Evidence]] convergence/contrasts across users of the [[Roam Discourse Graph extension]] in terms of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidence | and [[Evidence]] convergence/contrasts across users of the [[Roam Discourse Graph extension]] in terms of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidence | ||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040600256485797889/1040702747659489391 | |Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040600256485797889/1040702747659489391 | ||
}}{{Message | |||
|Author=joelchan86 | |||
|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/322545403876868096/6dd171845a7a4e30603d98ae510c77b8.png?size=1024 | |||
|Date Sent=22-11-13 03:34:58 | |||
|Channel=incentive-mechanisms | |||
|Text=my examples are more the latter. | |||
there are also strong roots in this idea of [[Infrastructure]] in CSCW, studying lots of attempts to get scientists to adopt new infrastructure and why they... didn't work. | |||
one challenge is the [[Claim]] that "infrastructures often fail because of the inertia of the installed base" (existing software, workflows, norms, institutions, legal codes, etc.) | |||
one decent entry point [[Source]] on this: | |||
Information Infrastructures and the Challenge of the Installed Base | SpringerLink | |||
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-51020-0_3 | |||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1041061650977009704/1041194438329901137 | |||
}}{{Message | |||
|Author=Wutbot | |||
|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/709165833888464966/d959819a9a72aa307c6ef1b91d7f94a2.png?size=1024 | |||
|Date Sent=22-11-23 18:59:16 | |||
|Channel=discourse-modeling | |||
|Text=[[claim]] claims and questions dominate in natural conversation; the imbalance of sources & evidence is quite stark. This aligns with my mental model of *conversational charity*, where we assume our interlocutors *could* ground their statements in evidence if pressed, but skip this step in the interest of time. | |||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1038988750677606432/1045050924466458725 | |||
}} | }} | ||