91
edits
Computable Graphs: Difference between revisions
→question What additional context beyond provenance could be useful?
(notes from day 2) |
|||
| Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
DeFacto tool for deep fact validation on the web: [[/github.com/DeFacto/DeFacto|https://github.com/DeFacto/DeFacto]] | DeFacto tool for deep fact validation on the web: [[/github.com/DeFacto/DeFacto|https://github.com/DeFacto/DeFacto]] | ||
==== [[question]] What additional context beyond provenance could be useful? ==== | ==== [[question]] What additional context beyond provenance could be useful for scholarly knowledge graphs specifically? ==== | ||
* Concept drift over time (in general entity/relation evolution over time) | * Concept drift over time (in general entity/relation evolution over time) | ||
* Seems like discourse links across papers don’t neatly fit the provenance definition, but are an aspect we want to capture? | * Seems like discourse links across papers don’t neatly fit the provenance definition, but are an aspect we want to capture? | ||
* Are there other aspects that provenance doesn’t cover? | * Are there other aspects that provenance doesn’t cover? | ||
* Some key pointers in Bowker (2000): https://joelchan.me/INST801-FA22%20Readings/Bowker_2000_Biodiversity%20Datadiversity.pdf | |||
==== Links to NLP research ==== | ==== Links to NLP research ==== | ||