Synthesizing Social Media/First Breakout Session: Difference between revisions

 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 48: Line 48:
* Imagine if you could create for yourself a unique, short, readable identifier for a paper, and add that in your post thread about your paper announcement.
* Imagine if you could create for yourself a unique, short, readable identifier for a paper, and add that in your post thread about your paper announcement.
** Possible syntax:
** Possible syntax:
*** @mor:crisis-informatics //user namespace
*** <code>@mor:crisis-informatics</code> user namespace
**** downsides: there are multiple authors, so an author may feel left out if another author's id gets used more often or authors could coalesce around one author (ie, 1st author)
**** downsides: there are multiple authors, so an author may feel left out if another author's id gets used more often or authors could coalesce around one author (ie, 1st author)
*** <nowiki>#</nowiki>cscw22:crisis-informatics //conference namespace
*** <code><nowiki>#</nowiki>cscw22:crisis-informatics</code> conference namespace
**** downsides: possibility for name conflicts, you could use the conference ID but it's not very readable
**** downsides: possibility for name conflicts, you could use the conference ID but it's not very readable
* Things you could do as a result:
* Things you could do as a result:
Line 60: Line 60:
=== Sharing attention data on ActivityPub through Zotero (?) extension ===
=== Sharing attention data on ActivityPub through Zotero (?) extension ===
* Attention data (~digital pheromone trails) is an important step in the knowledge synthesis pipeline- what am I looking at and my assessment of it
* Attention data (~digital pheromone trails) is an important step in the knowledge synthesis pipeline- what am I looking at and my assessment of it
* Linked data over ActivityPub-  
* Sharing attention data using linked data over ActivityPub-  
** Pros- catching Mastodon wave, good expressivity but  
** Pros- catching Mastodon wave, good expressivity but  
** Cons- writing it manually creates friction and so reduces usage by researchers
** Cons- writing it manually creates friction and so reduces usage by researchers
Line 71: Line 71:
** Content recommendation
** Content recommendation
** Layering paper viewers with endorsements/reviews, popular tags & annotations
** Layering paper viewers with endorsements/reviews, popular tags & annotations
*References
**[https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2818048.2819949 Opportunities and Challenges Around a Tool for Social and Public Web Activity Tracking]
**[https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3511095.3536361 From Users to (Sense)Makers: On the Pivotal Role of Stigmergic Social Annotation in the Quest for Collective Sensemaking]


[[Category:Conversation]]
[[Category:Conversation]]
19

edits