29
edits
Talk:Social Systems: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* funders can probably change the infrastructure and regulations | * funders can probably change the infrastructure and regulations | ||
Q: stakeholders? | '''Q: stakeholders?''' | ||
* Researchers | * Researchers | ||
* grant funders | * grant funders | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* Other: industry, taxpayers | * Other: industry, taxpayers | ||
Q - change | '''Q - change coming from which stakeholders?''' | ||
* Biggest US and European | * Biggest US and European | ||
* smaller foundations, not supper novel ideas, a lot of outliers in Web3 | * smaller foundations, not supper novel ideas, a lot of outliers in Web3 | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
* start small and demonstrate value | * start small and demonstrate value | ||
* | '''Push for the adoption of new systems:''' | ||
* works but not optimal: some systems work great on a small scale, but scale to promote less nice behaviour | |||
* Readiness of academia? | |||
* otoh, early adopters don't need to be big | |||
Nouran: | |||
*HCI community: the driving force is actually the academics | |||
* Tool building perspective: challenges? | |||
* Reputation & interactions in online space: how can we build better tools to help users navigate these spaces without being afraid of their reputation | |||
Martin Q - if we create spaces to allow researchers to come together away from their high reputation game, how do they tap into research initiatives and new funders and funding mechanisms? | |||
Open Questions? | |||
**developing incentive mechanisms for contributions to understanding the status of the knowledge frontier** | |||
**incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains**. | **incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains**. | ||