Jump to content

Interdisciplinary Models: Difference between revisions

1,337 bytes added ,  04:01, 12 November 2022
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
|Members=James Howison, Paul Itoi, Peter Murray-Rust, Wayne Lutters
|Members=James Howison, Paul Itoi, Peter Murray-Rust, Wayne Lutters
}}
}}
== What ==
How do we define minimal information models tuned for synthesis that can interoperate across various disciplines?
Concrete problem expressed by [[Peter-Murray Rust]] here: https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040214388554084372/1040299259930611833: "The idea of Hypothesis testing is common in some disciplines, unknown in others. For example chemical synthesis or materials science is "can we make X?" and many sciences are exploratory - what can we see with a new telescope, plants in Antarctica, etc. You have to design your project but I suspect Hypothesis doesn't come into it."
And to a certain extent, the issue of representing/discussing the discourse of computational research (e.g., model parameters), discussed by [[Konrad Hinsen]] here: https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1038988750677606432/1039576903838859326
This connects also with [[Peter-Murray Rust]]'s work on [[Semantic Climate]] (semantifying the IPCC report).
* see discussion here: https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040057721044598788/1040060670907002973
* and here: https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1033091746139230238/1040226423346040853
And also connects to emerging discussions around interoperability and Surfacing/managing/resolving disagreements in ontologies/terms/federation