Discourse Modeling

Revision as of 20:53, 12 November 2022 by KyleMacLaury (talk | contribs)
Discourse Modeling
Description Implement Discourse Graph schema in Semantic MediaWiki. Query Discourse Graph contents through SMW sparql endpoint. Visualize and publish Discourse Graph contents.
Related Topics Discourse Graphs, SPARQL
Projects Federated knowledge synthesis, Making Discourse Graphs Indexable & Discoverable
Discord Channel #discourse-modeling
Facilitator Karola Kirsanow
Members Kyle MacLaury, Sam Klein, Konrad Hinsen, Karola Kirsanow, Peter Murray-Rust

What

It could be really valuable to try to prototype a "computable" synthesis of the knowledge in this workshop here in the wiki. One test of the "computability" would be to make it visualizable.

Could have applications to the semantic climate setting that Peter Murray-Rust is working on

Now you're playing with templates

  • {{ Source}} template : URL, publisher, publisher-url, date, author, title


Sj, 2022-11-12. Discourse modeling templates. Synthesis Infrastructures wiki.

  • Claim :
  • Axiom (?) :

Potential Actions

Modules

There are other

  • Semantic MediaWiki
    • Front End
      • Embed CloudObjects from Wolfram Cloud
      • User chooses model and specifies input parameters
      • User applies model to input parameters
        • Call API that executes
    • rdf database
  • Wolfram Cloud
    • Use SPARQLExecute to call the SPARQL endpoint
    • Apply Model to query results
    • Publish visualizations as CloudObjects
    • Publish API that executes model/algorithm

Discord

joelchan86#discourse graphs22-11-10 15:55:39

we think the problem now is user-friendly tools and workfows that can create discourse graph structures, and have seen some exciting progress across a bunch of new user-facing "personal wikis". but bridging from personal to communal is still a challenge, partially bc of tooling.

this is why i'm excited about the Discourse Modeling idea, which i sort of understand as a way to try to instantiate something like Discourse Graphs into a wiki (bc wikis have a lot more in-built affordances for collaboration, such as edit histories, talk pages, etc.), which may hopefully lead to a lower barrier to entry for collaborative discourse graphing.

a high hope is that we can develop a process that is easy enough to understand and implement that can then be applied to discourse graphing the IPCC or similarly large body of research on a focused, contentious, interdisciplinary topic.

other examples include: - effects of masks on community transmission (can't do decisive RCTs, need to synthesize) - effects of social media on political (dys)function: (existing crowdsourced lit review here, in traditional narrative form: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vVAtMCQnz8WVxtSNQev_e1cGmY9rnY96ecYuAj6C548/edit#)