Talk:Social Systems
Revision as of 16:02, 12 November 2022 by Silvianetobessa (talk | contribs)
Open Notes
Martin
- Reward contributions and how they affect behavior
- Collect few opinions on how the rewarding can be done, other examples and what worked or didn't work
Angelina:
- Questions about adoption
- Regulations (for example, in USA there's data open or they don't receive money anymore), in EU there's a proposal to evaluate researchers using diff metrics, such as openness
Sílvia
- old incentives, what are the ones in place besides reputation?
- What should we keep in mind when creating
Angelina
- replacing the old system would be detrimental to the adoption
- transfer their merits to the new system
- progressive adoption of new metrics in behavior that accommodates certain
Rafie
- metrics are used to "judge" researchers to allocate grants
- democratically incentives, but existing structures are not democratically enough
- Most of the incentives are monetary (there are social)
- researchers are not in a position to decide; they're put in the system
- funders can probably change the infrastructure and regulations
Q: stakeholders?
- Researchers
- grant funders
- publishing agencies
- Other: industry, taxpayers
Q - change coming from which stakeholders?
- Biggest US and European
- smaller foundations, not supper novel ideas, a lot of outliers in Web3
- researcher will move to web3 in 10 to 20
- Stepwise approach, led by biggest funder
- alternative view*: demonstrate the reality of sth, Web3 and Desci - opportunity to demonstrate structures and mechanisms working in a small scale, and showcasing to onboard larger organizations
- start small and demonstrate value
Push for the adoption of new systems:
- works but not optimal: some systems work great on a small scale, but scale to promote less nice behaviour
- Readiness of academia?
- otoh, early adopters don't need to be big
Nouran:
- HCI community: the driving force is actually the academics
- Tool building perspective: challenges?
- Reputation & interactions in online space: how can we build better tools to help users navigate these spaces without being afraid of their reputation
Martin Q - if we create spaces to allow researchers to come together away from their high reputation game, how do they tap into research initiatives and new funders and funding mechanisms?
Open Questions - validate assumptions for the system that should work on a bigger scale?
- how do we determine the systems that will work on a big scale without testing them on a large scale?
- Valerii shares his company approach: small-scale test, update the pre-existing model + ar
Open Questions?
spec out different funding/incentive models for sustaining the work of synthesis
developing incentive mechanisms for contributions to understanding the status of the knowledge frontier
incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains