Discourse Modeling: Difference between revisions

Discourse Modeling (view source)

Revision as of 15:54, 10 November 2022

1,528 bytes added , 15:54, 10 November 2022

→‎Discord: new section

Jonny

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

982

edits

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 ** Publish visualizations as CloudObjects
 ** Publish API that executes model/algorithm
+== Discord ==
+{{Message
+|Author=joelchan86
+|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/322545403876868096/6dd171845a7a4e30603d98ae510c77b8.png?size=1024
+|Date Sent=22-11-10 15:55:39
+|Channel=discourse graphs
+|Text=we think the problem now is user-friendly tools and workfows that can create discourse graph structures, and have seen some exciting progress across a bunch of new user-facing "personal wikis". but bridging from personal to communal is still a challenge, partially bc of tooling.
+this is why i'm excited about the [[Discourse Modeling]] idea, which i sort of understand as a way to try to instantiate something like [[Discourse Graphs]] into a wiki (bc wikis have a lot more in-built affordances for collaboration, such as edit histories, talk pages, etc.), which may hopefully lead to a lower barrier to entry for collaborative discourse graphing.
+a high hope is that we can develop a process that is easy enough to understand and implement that can then be applied to discourse graphing the IPCC or similarly large body of research on a focused, contentious, interdisciplinary topic.
+other examples include:
+- effects of masks on community transmission (can't do decisive RCTs, need to synthesize)
+- effects of social media on political (dys)function: (existing crowdsourced lit review here, in traditional narrative form: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vVAtMCQnz8WVxtSNQev_e1cGmY9rnY96ecYuAj6C548/edit#)
+|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040214388554084372/1040293673851691059
+}}