14
edits
m (→Resources) |
(Flesh out 'compiling graphs to manuscripts' project) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* Belinda: what is scope of the project in terms of users? | * Belinda: what is scope of the project in terms of users? | ||
** Matt: hoping this accessible all the way to high school students also! | ** Matt: hoping this accessible all the way to high school students also! | ||
* | * AICS is making platform for running simulations, make it easy to run and share with others - [[Simularium]] | ||
* Dafna: are there pain points on the input side? (seems painful!) | * Dafna: are there pain points on the input side? (seems painful!) | ||
* Dafna: how similar are the things that people pull out from the same paper? | * Dafna: how similar are the things that people pull out from the same paper? | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
* idea of compiling from discourse graph to manuscript seems feasible? | * idea of compiling from discourse graph to manuscript seems feasible? | ||
** Belinda could mock something up in OpenAI playground really quickly for a few papers | ** Belinda could mock something up in OpenAI playground really quickly for a few papers | ||
*** need examples or access to repo | *** need examples or access to repo | ||
Line 76: | Line 75: | ||
== Compiling graphs to manuscripts == | == Compiling graphs to manuscripts == | ||
=== Overview === | |||
We'd like to build a prototype of a tool that starts with discourse units (phrases with the category Question/motivation, Method, Evidence, Claim) and uses NLP to generate a draft of a manuscript paragraph. | |||
[[File:Discourse graph to manuscript draft via NLP.png|900x900px]] | |||
=== Purpose === | |||
Such a tool would speed up a really time consuming aspect of the academic job: drafting grant proposals and manuscripts from content. It would also encourage researchers to generate structured content (questions/claims/evidence) which will get incorporated into a discourse graph. | |||
The benefit to the user is a structured approach to writing papers and grant proposals. Using the tool will introduce researchers to the concept of discourse units, and generate a repository of discourse units that can be turned into discourse graphs. | |||
=== Ideal outcomes === | |||
(more to add here) | |||
This tool could also enable the micropublication of mini discourse graphs (one question/method/evidence/claim) by generating a draft of the explanatory text. | |||
* Could also integrate into Roam Research graphs, e.g. in Matt's lab, via the Roam GPT-3 extension | |||
=== What we're doing next === | |||
* Belinda could mock something up in OpenAI playground really quickly for a few papers | |||
** need examples or access to repo | |||
* Matt and Michael will share some examples of papers or content from the discourse graph to use as source data | |||
* Sid can check out [https://github.com/LayBacc/roam-ai Roam AI extension] for incorporation into our roam graph workflow (fork, make modifications etc) | |||
** ([https://www.reddit.com/r/RoamResearch/comments/yigf6q/im_genuinely_fascinated_with_the_roam_ai/ discussion on its usage]) | |||
** [https://www.loom.com/share/d152e7a184f94080b8777f595821f43e usage video] | |||
=== Related conversation === | |||
* Dafna: "compiling" discourse graph to manuscript seems much easier, esp. if have consistent structure and human-in-the-loop | |||
** Similar to brainstorming discussion/ethics statements for a paper given abstract (via GPT-3 | |||
* Belinda: how much variation in paper structure within your field? | |||
** some variations by journal | |||
=== Claims in the conversation that need evidence === | |||
* the majority of empirical research papers in biology have a similar structure (question/ motivation/ evidence (fig.1a)/ claim for each paragraph & figure panel) | |||
* multiple researchers (or students) asked to highlight the questions/claims/evidence text from a paper will highlight similar/consensus text (part of the NLP-to-highlights project) | |||
== Next Steps == | == Next Steps == |
edits