982
edits
Tags: Manual revert Visual edit |
No edit summary |
||
Line 429: | Line 429: | ||
|Text=I am definitely on team "scruffy" per Lindsay Poirier's typology (BTW "[[A Turn for the Scruffy]]" should be on the collective [[Reading List]] for anyone who hasn't come across it) and so yes definitely "Own-terminology" iterating into something shared, part of why i love the semwiki model of building them. On the other end of things for tomorrow - Is there any particular existing ontology/schema/etc. anyone in this group would like to have imported into the wiki for discourse modeling? | |Text=I am definitely on team "scruffy" per Lindsay Poirier's typology (BTW "[[A Turn for the Scruffy]]" should be on the collective [[Reading List]] for anyone who hasn't come across it) and so yes definitely "Own-terminology" iterating into something shared, part of why i love the semwiki model of building them. On the other end of things for tomorrow - Is there any particular existing ontology/schema/etc. anyone in this group would like to have imported into the wiki for discourse modeling? | ||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1038988750677606432/1040830926629896212 | |Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1038988750677606432/1040830926629896212 | ||
}}{{Message | |||
|Author=Wutbot | |||
|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/709165833888464966/d959819a9a72aa307c6ef1b91d7f94a2.png?size=1024 | |||
|Date Sent=22-11-12 11:22:37 | |||
|Channel=general-brainstorming | |||
|Text=those brackets cue the [[WikiBot]] to link the message to the wiki page containing the mentioned terms | |||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1034992937391632444/1040949739933401148 | |||
}} | }} |