A Turn for the Scruffy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Document | {{Document | ||
|PDF= | |PDF=File:Poirier - 2017 - A turn for the scruffy an ethnographic study of s.pdf | ||
|Publisher=WebSci | |Publisher=WebSci | ||
|DOI=10.1145/3091478.3091505 | |DOI=10.1145/3091478.3091505 | ||
Latest revision as of 03:36, 12 November 2022
| A Turn for the Scruffy | |
|---|---|
| Short Description | Discusses a dichotomy between thought styles in semantic web, "Neats" and "Scruffies" |
| Contributors/Creators | Lindsay Poirier |
| Topic(s) | Semantic Web, Mental Models |
| URL | https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3091478.3091505 |
| A Turn for the Scruffy | |
|---|---|
| PDF (local) | File:Poirier - 2017 - A turn for the scruffy an ethnographic study of s.pdf |
| Publication Venue | WebSci |
| DOI | 10.1145/3091478.3091505 |
Discord
I am definitely on team "scruffy" per Lindsay Poirier's typology (BTW "A Turn for the Scruffy" should be on the collective Reading List for anyone who hasn't come across it) and so yes definitely "Own-terminology" iterating into something shared, part of why i love the semwiki model of building them. On the other end of things for tomorrow - Is there any particular existing ontology/schema/etc. anyone in this group would like to have imported into the wiki for discourse modeling?