Discord Messages: Difference between revisions

815 bytes added ,  03:29, 12 November 2022
→‎22-11-12: new section
No edit summary
(→‎22-11-12: new section)
Line 418: Line 418:
|Text=super glad to hear that the endpoint worked btw, i've never used SPARQL and am more used to just making my own data models that generate API queries & parse etc. so I would love to see what you've been doing and how you've been using it - I'll make a [[SPARQL]] page linked off the wiki page that gives the URL and maybe we can embed sample queries and etc. there
|Text=super glad to hear that the endpoint worked btw, i've never used SPARQL and am more used to just making my own data models that generate API queries & parse etc. so I would love to see what you've been doing and how you've been using it - I'll make a [[SPARQL]] page linked off the wiki page that gives the URL and maybe we can embed sample queries and etc. there
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040116311952470026/1040764119294410773
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040116311952470026/1040764119294410773
}}
== 22-11-12 ==
{{Message
|Author=sneakers-the-rat
|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/305044217393053697/2970b22bd769d0cd0ee1de79be500e85.png?size=1024
|Date Sent=22-11-12 03:30:30
|Channel=discourse-modeling
|Text=I am definitely on team "scruffy" per Lindsay Poirier's typology (BTW "[[A Turn for the Scruffy]]" should be on the collective [[Reading List]] for anyone who hasn't come across it) and so yes definitely "Own-terminology" iterating into something shared, part of why i love the semwiki model of building them. On the other end of things for tomorrow - Is there any particular existing ontology/schema/etc. anyone in this group would like to have imported into the wiki for discourse modeling?
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1038988750677606432/1040830926629896212
}}
}}