Talk:Discourse Modeling: Difference between revisions

Talk:Discourse Modeling (view source)

Revision as of 22:38, 12 November 2022

248 bytes added , 22:38, 12 November 2022

m

→‎Section 2 Konrad

Karola

42

edits

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 == Section 2 Konrad ==
-* - KM: take  contributions to this wiki as data to generate a discourse graph?
+*KM: [[question]] can we take  contributions to this wiki as data to generate a discourse graph?
-* - create schema, show others how to create the different node types
+**[[claim]] this means creating a  schema, show others how to create the different node types
-* - take db backend, ingest it, execute queries against it
+**[[claim]] this means take db backend, ingest it, execute queries against it
-* - viz may not be super-sophisticated, but a view or 2 framed on each node type would be worthwhile: eg how does a question related to claims, how are claims informed by different articles (evidence)
+**[[claim]] viz may not be super-sophisticated, but a view or 2 framed on each node type would be worthwhile: eg how does a question related to claims, how are claims informed by different articles (evidence)
-* - need to populate the wiki with the elements of a discourse graph --> create viz --> share code
+*[[claim] ]need to populate the wiki with the elements of a discourse graph --> create viz --> share code
-* - SJ: would like to accomplish naming: coming up with names for each of those components, and names for things at differnt scales - discussion, family of hyptheses, family of experiments
+* SJ: [[question]]  can we accomplish naming: coming up with names for each of those components, and names for things at different scales - discussion, family of hypotheses, family of experiments
-* - this will allow us to say that if you have identified x ideas, hypotheses, etc - how many discourses do you need to describe? how many graphs are needed to illustrate those discourses - when are people working on the same graph?
+**[[claim]]this will allow us to say that if you have identified x ideas, hypotheses, etc - how many discourses do you need to describe? how many graphs are needed to illustrate those discourses - when are people working on the same graph?
-* - what does it mean to have different graphs that share some pieces, or different graphs in or close to the same namespace
+**[[question]] what does it mean to have different graphs that share some pieces, or different graphs in or close to the same namespace
-* - --> boil down to the naming of the pieces and how you place the connections - ho much context do you need to figure out how many connections there are?
+**[[claim]] these issues  --> boil down to the naming of the pieces and how you place the connections - how much context do you need to figure out how many connections there are?
 * - KM: taking this as an opportunity to  learn SPARQL
-* - we need namespaces before we can qury anything - naming is critical!
+*KM: [[claim]] we need namespaces before we can query anything - naming is critical!
-* - KH: also relatively
+*SJ: [[claim]] we should name and make list of queries - queries nee their own names
-* - Sj: we should name and make list of queries - queries nee their own names
+* KM: [[question]] what is  agora?
-* - KM: agora?
+*SJ: [[claim]] agora is a group of people interested in wiki linking and editable networks & knowledge federation
-* - SJ: group of people interested in wiki linking and editable networks & knowledge federation
+*[[claim]] agora's goals include:
-* - goals:
 * 	- make linking always do something sensible - best effort connection between links
 * 		- agora is a url pattern that will try to resolve it
 * 		- redirect strings to appropriate resources
 * 		- each reader gets a filter - only see certain nodes & connection based on sort preferences
-* 		- KM: sounds like auto-complete for knowledge graphs
+* 		- KM: [[claim]] sounds like auto-complete for knowledge graphs
 * 	- each agora has a few default sections - ex will try to generate related out nodes, related agoras you know with the same title or fuzzy match, any text it finds in your own agaora ad-hov
-* 	- elevate dgsd by making a section that tries to generate a dg or discourses that mention this node
+* 	- elevate DGs by making a section that tries to generate a dg or discourses that mention this node
-* 	- dg is a shape you compile on the fly - could try to  generate a dg x stteps away and show you different families that might be referencingthis
+*[[claim]] dg is a shape you compile on the fly - could try to  generate a dg x steps away and show you different families that might be referencing this
-* 	- spirit of the agora is automatic discovery & openness to engagement
+** [[claim]s pirit of the agora is automatic discovery & openness to engagement
-* 	- KH: impression is that it is a collection - how would I learn that someone rlsewants to do something to my node
+**KH: [[question]] impression of agora  is that it is a collection - how would I learn that someone else wants to do something to my node?
-* 		- diff between creating a new link with the same name as your node and creating a link to your specic node
+*** SJ: [[claim]] diff between creating a new link with the same name as your node and creating a link to your specific node
-* 	- KK: diff between agora and what we enision?
+***KK: [[question]] diff between agora and what we envision?
 * 	- sj: no typology of links
 * 	- graph visualization does not ignore non-typed connections