29
edits
Talk:Social Systems: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Open Notes== | |||
Martin | |||
* Reward contributions and how they affect behavior | * Reward contributions and how they affect behavior | ||
* Collect few opinions on how the rewarding can be done, other examples and what worked or didn't work | * Collect few opinions on how the rewarding can be done, other examples and what worked or didn't work | ||
Angelina: | |||
* Questions about adoption | |||
* Regulations (for example, in USA there's data open or they don't receive money anymore), in EU there's a proposal to evaluate researchers using diff metrics, such as openness | |||
Sílvia | |||
- old incentives, what are the ones in place besides reputation? | |||
- What should we keep in mind when creating | |||
Angelina | |||
* replacing the old system would be detrimental to the adoption | |||
* transfer their merits to the new system | |||
* progressive adoption of new metrics in behavior that accommodates certain | |||
Rafie | |||
* metrics are used to "judge" researchers to allocate grants | |||
* democratically incentives, but existing structures are not democratically enough | |||
Vallerii | |||
* | |||
**incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains**. | |||