Discord Messages: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
|Text=this is almost exactly the idea with the [[WikiBot]] that pushes to a [[Semantic Wiki]], and good to have a name in [[Gradual Enrichment]]. looking forward to digging though the references and finishing that piece^ tomorrow. (and finishing the n-back linking syntax so I can just directly include the piece in the annotation that is this message). thanks for sharing π | |Text=this is almost exactly the idea with the [[WikiBot]] that pushes to a [[Semantic Wiki]], and good to have a name in [[Gradual Enrichment]]. looking forward to digging though the references and finishing that piece^ tomorrow. (and finishing the n-back linking syntax so I can just directly include the piece in the annotation that is this message). thanks for sharing π | ||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1035691728356790322/1037689452157481071 | |Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1035691728356790322/1037689452157481071 | ||
}}{{Message | |||
|Author=sneakers-the-rat | |||
|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/305044217393053697/2970b22bd769d0cd0ee1de79be500e85.png?size=1024 | |||
|Date Sent=22-11-03 22:51:30 | |||
|Channel=In terms of overlap with my own | |||
|Text=[[Project Ideas#Linked Data Publishing On Activitypub]] | |||
ooh I'm very interested in this. so are you thinking a [[Twitter#Bridge]] -> [[ActivityPub#Bridge]] where one could use markup within the twitter post to declare [[Linked Data#Markup Syntax]] and then post to AP? I have thought about this kind of thing before, like using a bot command syntax to declare prefixes by doing something like | |||
``` | |||
@ bot prefix | |||
foaf: https:// (ontology URL) | |||
``` | |||
or | |||
``` | |||
@ bot alias | |||
term: foaf.LongerNameForTerm | |||
``` | |||
so that one could do maybe a semantic wikilink like `[ [term::value] ]` either within the tweet or as a reply to it (so the tweet itself doesn't become cluttered/it can become organized post -hoc?). | |||
I've also thought about a bridge (I called [[Threadodo]] ) that implements that kind of command syntax to be able to directly archive threads to [[Zenodo]] along with structured information about the author, but this seems more interesting. | |||
I can help try and clear some of the groundwork out of the way to make it easier for you and other interested participants to experiment. I have asked around fedi a bunch for a very minimal AP server implementation, and I could try and find one (or we could try and prototype one) if you want to experiment with that :), and I can also document and show you a tweepy-based bot that has an extensible command/parsing system too | |||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1037786518800039978/1037861609885925467 | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:50, 3 November 2022
22-10-16
Once again i am talking about my Test Topic that's a part of my Test Project and i want to see some links in the reply
Now hopefully without the uncaught exceptions for Test Topic
Now I am going to link a message into a specific section in my Test Topic#New Section and also see if we propagate that through to the wikilinks in Test Project
Now I am going to link a message into a specific section in my Test Topic#New Section and also see if we propagate that through to the wikilinks in Test Project
i'll leave the bot running for a lil bit but yeah it's just running on my laptop for now, will move it over to the linode running the wiki when i go to switch the url. made a page to document the WikiBot#Status Updates
22-10-16
Once again i am talking about my Test Topic that's a part of my Test Project and i want to see some links in the reply
22-10-31
I would suggest turning Discord#Notifications off for this channel. on mobile click the person looking icon in the top right and then the notification options are near the top. on desktop there should be a bell-looking icon along the top row of icons
22-11-01
22-11-02
Excuse me let me be a good role model on continuous archiving. One of the reasons I am excited about academics adopting Mastodon is because ActivityPub is built on Linked Data, which i think inspires the possibility for fundamentally new modes of scholarly communication. I have written about this in the past (10.48550/arXiv.2209.07493, but will do my best to decenter my own ideas except for when I am using them as a demonstration for others as part of a demonstration of using the technology developed for the workshop
omg lmao WikiBot#TODO Don't make a separate page using semantic wikilinks lol
Then i just made a page to link to the pages. There's not really a well defined way to do meta-categorization like that in-medium as far as I'm aware, but am happy to receive WikiBot#Feature Requests about it
Konrad, are you familiar with Chemical Markup Language (CML)? I stumbled across it on Twitter a few weeks ago via discussions about open publishing, and was surprised at the longevity of the project. I donβt love XML, but it seems to have gained some traction in its day, though I am not sure how active it is these days. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_Markup_Language
22-11-03
ah, that is both informative and sad to hear. i think ahead of its time is a reasonable diagnosis.
ScholOnto I think was also ahead of its time: had a working prototype integration into a Word processor for directly authoring discourse-graph like things while drafting a manuscript (described here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/int.20188)
this is almost exactly the idea with the WikiBot that pushes to a Semantic Wiki, and good to have a name in Gradual Enrichment. looking forward to digging though the references and finishing that piece^ tomorrow. (and finishing the n-back linking syntax so I can just directly include the piece in the annotation that is this message). thanks for sharing π
Project Ideas#Linked Data Publishing On Activitypub
ooh I'm very interested in this. so are you thinking a Twitter#Bridge -> ActivityPub#Bridge where one could use markup within the twitter post to declare Linked Data#Markup Syntax and then post to AP? I have thought about this kind of thing before, like using a bot command syntax to declare prefixes by doing something like ``` @ bot prefix foaf: https:// (ontology URL) ``` or ``` @ bot alias term: foaf.LongerNameForTerm ``` so that one could do maybe a semantic wikilink like `[ [term::value] ]` either within the tweet or as a reply to it (so the tweet itself doesn't become cluttered/it can become organized post -hoc?).
I've also thought about a bridge (I called Threadodo ) that implements that kind of command syntax to be able to directly archive threads to Zenodo along with structured information about the author, but this seems more interesting.
I can help try and clear some of the groundwork out of the way to make it easier for you and other interested participants to experiment. I have asked around fedi a bunch for a very minimal AP server implementation, and I could try and find one (or we could try and prototype one) if you want to experiment with that :), and I can also document and show you a tweepy-based bot that has an extensible command/parsing system too