982
edits
Deniz Aydemir: Difference between revisions
Undo revision 464 by Jonny (talk)
Tag: Undo |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Participant | {{Participant | ||
|Table Assignment=Table 5}} | |||
|Table Assignment=Table 5 | |||
}} | |||
{{Workshop Submission | {{Workshop Submission | ||
|Interest=It is becoming increasingly important to create a standard for how knowledge graphs and ontologies can be made interoperable, and I propose solving this with what I am calling a "Discourse Protocol". More and more users are thinking about how best to structure their own research and writing using personal ontologies, and tools like Roam, Logseq, Obsidian, Notion, and now Tana (among others) are continuing to add more ways for users to create semantic relationships within their notes. We want a world where my knowledge graph can reference your knowledge graph, but I shouldn't have to understand your whole personal ontology in order to reference content you've published. We need to create some sort of standard protocol for knowledge content in order to make it possible for different users using different tools and their own personal ontologies to reference each other's work in a sensible way. There are existing ontologies that attempt to be globally applicable, but as a community we should be forming a well-supported and future-proof standard "Discourse Protocol" that both creates a general structure through which users can interface their personal knowledge graphs, and also creates a clear way for all these disparate note-taking applications to publish interoperable content. | |Interest=It is becoming increasingly important to create a standard for how knowledge graphs and ontologies can be made interoperable, and I propose solving this with what I am calling a "Discourse Protocol". More and more users are thinking about how best to structure their own research and writing using personal ontologies, and tools like Roam, Logseq, Obsidian, Notion, and now Tana (among others) are continuing to add more ways for users to create semantic relationships within their notes. We want a world where my knowledge graph can reference your knowledge graph, but I shouldn't have to understand your whole personal ontology in order to reference content you've published. We need to create some sort of standard protocol for knowledge content in order to make it possible for different users using different tools and their own personal ontologies to reference each other's work in a sensible way. There are existing ontologies that attempt to be globally applicable, but as a community we should be forming a well-supported and future-proof standard "Discourse Protocol" that both creates a general structure through which users can interface their personal knowledge graphs, and also creates a clear way for all these disparate note-taking applications to publish interoperable content. | ||