Talk:Discourse Modeling: Difference between revisions

No change in size ,  17:02, 13 November 2022
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:
** {{d|id=fed-wiki-git |a=? |type=claim |text=pages in a federated wiki are more like working in branches as in git |clarifies=fed-wiki}}  
** {{d|id=fed-wiki-git |a=? |type=claim |text=pages in a federated wiki are more like working in branches as in git |clarifies=fed-wiki}}  
*** {{d|id=fed-wiki-merging |a=? |type=claim |text=''branches'' and ''merges'' are important ideas in the federated wiki concept space |supports=fed-wiki-git}}  
*** {{d|id=fed-wiki-merging |a=? |type=claim |text=''branches'' and ''merges'' are important ideas in the federated wiki concept space |supports=fed-wiki-git}}  
* {{d|id=author-dgs |a=KH |type=claim |text=we talk about DGs as if they are done by the *reader* of a paper, but at some point, *authors* will start out by creating DGs to which readers will respond. We should consider the reader --> author transition |supports=}}  
* {{d|id=author-dgs |a=KH |type=claim |text=we talk about DGs as if they are done by the *reader* of a paper, but at some point, *authors* will start out by creating DGs to which readers will respond. We should consider the reader ==> author transition |supports=}}  
** {{d|id=author-label-loss |a=KH |type=question |text=will the "author" label on scientific papers disappear as collaborations grow? |supports=author-dgs }}  
** {{d|id=author-label-loss |a=KH |type=question |text=will the "author" label on scientific papers disappear as collaborations grow? |supports=author-dgs }}  
* {{d|id=better-graph-viz |a=? |type=question |text=can we enable effective and usable graph visualizations? |supports=}}  
* {{d|id=better-graph-viz |a=? |type=question |text=can we enable effective and usable graph visualizations? |supports=}}  
Line 58: Line 58:
<!--
<!--
*[[question]] problem with wiki is that there is only one version of each page - what if you disagree?
*[[question]] problem with wiki is that there is only one version of each page - what if you disagree?
**[[claim]] in wiki each page has a single version --> federated wiki is the solution
**[[claim]] in wiki each page has a single version ==> federated wiki is the solution
**[[claim]] pages in a federated wiki are more like working in branches as in git
**[[claim]] pages in a federated wiki are more like working in branches as in git
***[[claim]] *branches* and *merges* are important ideas in the federated wiki concept space
***[[claim]] *branches* and *merges* are important ideas in the federated wiki concept space
* KH: [[claim]] we talk about DGs as if they are done by the *reader* of a paper, but at some point, *authors* will start out by creating DGs to which readers will respond. We should consider the reader --> author transition  
* KH: [[claim]] we talk about DGs as if they are done by the *reader* of a paper, but at some point, *authors* will start out by creating DGs to which readers will respond. We should consider the reader ==> author transition  
**KH: [[question]] will the "author" label on scientific papers disappear as collaborations grow?
**KH: [[question]] will the "author" label on scientific papers disappear as collaborations grow?
*[[question]] can we enable effective and usable graph visualizations?
*[[question]] can we enable effective and usable graph visualizations?
57

edits