42
edits
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
***[[question]] how can we build on this and extend it? | ***[[question]] how can we build on this and extend it? | ||
***[[claim]]this project is more of a long-term coordination, determining who is interested in doing what over the next few years | ***[[claim]]this project is more of a long-term coordination, determining who is interested in doing what over the next few years | ||
***[[question]]federation as in federated wiki? | ***[[question]] federation as in federated wiki? | ||
*** [[claim]] this is more of a a meta-project, don't expect an artefact | *** [[claim]] this is more of a a meta-project, don't expect an artefact | ||
*[[question]] problem with wiki is that there is only one version of each page - what if you disagree? | *[[question]] problem with wiki is that there is only one version of each page - what if you disagree? | ||
* | **[[claim]] in wiki each page has a single version --> federated wiki is the solution | ||
* | **[[claim]] pages in a federated wiki are more like working in branches as in git | ||
* | ***[[claim]] *branches* and *merges* are important ideas in the federated wiki concept space | ||
* | * KH: [[claim]] we talk about DGs as if they are done by the *reader* of a paper, but at some point, *authors* will start out by creating DGs to which readers will respond. We should consider the reader --> author transition | ||
**KH: [[question]] : will the "author" label on scientific papers disappear as collaborations grow? | |||
*[[question]] can we enable effective and usable graph visualizations? | |||
* | *[[question]] do DG graph properties scale to communally edited collaborative graphs? | ||
* | |||
*[[question]] how can you start w/ something highly formalized like version control and meet in the middle at something suitable for narratives? | |||
**KK: [[evidence]] [https://everything2.com/ everything2] | |||
* | **KK:[[evidence]] [https://anagora.org/agora agora] | ||
* SJ: [[question]] what types of graph are we talking about? | |||
* | **SJ:[[claim]]I haven't seen dgs about discourse: chains of reasoning, mapping out arguments - these can be linear if there is a dialog | ||
* | **SJ: [[question]] what does composite graph of discourse addressing the same issues look like? | ||
* | **SJ: [[claim]] personal or group notetaking: connections are not discourse connections - they include refrences, clarifiers, and links of definitions | ||
* | |||
* | |||
== Section 2 Konrad == | == Section 2 Konrad == |
edits