Talk:Discourse Modeling: Difference between revisions

Line 15: Line 15:
***[[question]] how can we build on this and extend it?
***[[question]] how can we build on this and extend it?
***[[claim]]this project is more of a long-term coordination, determining who is interested in doing what over the next few years
***[[claim]]this project is more of a long-term coordination, determining who is interested in doing what over the next few years
***[[question]]federation as in federated wiki?
***[[question]] federation as in federated wiki?
*** [[claim]] this is more of a  a meta-project, don't expect an artefact
*** [[claim]] this is more of a  a meta-project, don't expect an artefact


*[[question]] problem with wiki is that there is only one version of each page - what if you disagree?
*[[question]] problem with wiki is that there is only one version of each page - what if you disagree?
* - [[claim]] in wiki each page has a single version --> federated wiki is the solution
**[[claim]] in wiki each page has a single version --> federated wiki is the solution
* - [[claim]] pages in a federated wiki are more like working in branches as in git
**[[claim]] pages in a federated wiki are more like working in branches as in git
* - [[claim]] *branches* and *merges* are important ideas in the federated wiki concept space
***[[claim]] *branches* and *merges* are important ideas in the federated wiki concept space
* - (federation model)
* KH: [[claim]] we talk about DGs as if they are done by the *reader* of a paper, but at some point, *authors* will start out by creating DGs to which readers will respond. We should consider the reader --> author transition
* - (conflict resolution)
**KH: [[question]] : will the "author" label on scientific papers disappear as collaborations grow?
* - [[claim]] we talk about DGs as if they are done by the *reader* of a paper, but at some point, *authors* will start o ut by creating DGs to which readers will respond
*[[question]] can we enable effective and usable graph visualizations?
* - [[question]] how can you start w something highly formalized like version control and meet in the middle at something suitable for narratives?
*[[question]] do DG graph properties scale to communally edited collaborative graphs?
* - [[evidence]] everything2
 
* - [[evidence]] agora
*[[question]] how can you start w/ something highly formalized like version control and meet in the middle at something suitable for narratives?
* - [[question]] can we enable effective and usable graph visualizations?
**KK: [[evidence]] [https://everything2.com/ everything2]
* - [[question]] do DG graph properties scale to communally edited collaborative graphs?
**KK:[[evidence]] [https://anagora.org/agora agora]
* - reader --> author transition
* SJ: [[question]] what types of graph are we talking about?
* - [[question]] KH: will the "author" label on scientific papers disappear as collaborations grow?
**SJ:[[claim]]I haven't seen dgs about discourse: chains of reasoning, mapping out arguments - these can be linear if there is a dialog
* - SJ: what types of graph are we talking about?
**SJ: [[question]] what does composite graph  of discourse addressing the same issues look like?
* - I haven't seen dgs about discourse: chains of reasoning, mapping out arguments - these can be linear if there is a dialog
**SJ:  [[claim]] personal or group notetaking: connections are not discourse connections - they include refrences, clarifiers, and links of definitions
* - composite graph  of discourse addressing the same issues
* - personal or group notetaking: connections are not discourse connections
* - reference
* - clarifiers
* - links of definitions


== Section 2 Konrad ==
== Section 2 Konrad ==
42

edits