3
edits
Talk:Social Systems: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* metrics are used to "judge" researchers to allocate grants | * metrics are used to "judge" researchers to allocate grants | ||
* democratically incentives, but existing structures are not democratically enough | * democratically incentives, but existing structures are not democratically enough | ||
Jay (joining from the Interfaces group, adding some notes here for you) | |||
* badges from open science are a social signal of participating in a new practice (analog would be Rescognito.com for knowledge synthesis) | |||
* practical advice from studying the gamification literature may be valuable | |||
* psychological and sociological literature on volunteering and altruism may also inspire ideas (I'm trying to think from different angles) | |||
<br> | |||
| Line 26: | Line 34: | ||
* funders can probably change the infrastructure and regulations | * funders can probably change the infrastructure and regulations | ||
Q: stakeholders? | '''Q: stakeholders?''' | ||
* Researchers | * Researchers | ||
* grant funders | * grant funders | ||
| Line 32: | Line 40: | ||
* Other: industry, taxpayers | * Other: industry, taxpayers | ||
Q - change | '''Q - change coming from which stakeholders?''' | ||
* Biggest US and European | * Biggest US and European | ||
* smaller foundations, not supper novel ideas, a lot of outliers in Web3 | * smaller foundations, not supper novel ideas, a lot of outliers in Web3 | ||
| Line 41: | Line 49: | ||
* start small and demonstrate value | * start small and demonstrate value | ||
* | '''Push for the adoption of new systems:''' | ||
* works but not optimal: some systems work great on a small scale, but scale to promote less nice behaviour | |||
* Readiness of academia? | |||
* otoh, early adopters don't need to be big | |||
Nouran: | |||
*HCI community: the driving force is actually the academics | |||
* Tool building perspective: challenges? | |||
* Reputation & interactions in online space: how can we build better tools to help users navigate these spaces without being afraid of their reputation | |||
Martin Q - if we create spaces to allow researchers to come together away from their high reputation game, how do they tap into research initiatives and new funders and funding mechanisms? | |||
Open Questions - validate assumptions for the system that should work on a bigger scale? | |||
* how do we determine the systems that will work on a big scale without testing them on a large scale? | |||
* Valerii shares his company approach: small-scale test, update the pre-existing model + ar | |||
Open Questions? | |||
''' spec out different funding/incentive models for sustaining the work of synthesis ''' | |||
'''developing incentive mechanisms for contributions to understanding the status of the knowledge frontier''' | |||
'''incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains''' | |||