982
edits
Reading List: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→Discord: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Text=in the spirit of cultivating our garden: [[Reading List]] https://hapgood.us/2015/10/17/the-garden-and-the-stream-a-technopastoral/amp/ | |Text=in the spirit of cultivating our garden: [[Reading List]] https://hapgood.us/2015/10/17/the-garden-and-the-stream-a-technopastoral/amp/ | ||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1033091723389317160/1038112016038101062 | |Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1033091723389317160/1038112016038101062 | ||
}}{{Message | |||
|Author=joelchan86 | |||
|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/322545403876868096/6dd171845a7a4e30603d98ae510c77b8.png?size=1024 | |||
|Date Sent=22-11-10 21:38:25 | |||
|Channel=discourse graphs | |||
|Text=in human-computer interaction we have a similar problem of trying to think about and synthesize across many genres of contributions/research. one map (adapted for information studies) breaks things out into "empirical" contributions (these most often follow the standard intro/methods/results/discussion format), "conceptual" contributions (which are often more amorphous theory papers), and "constructive" contributions (making a new system/method) | |||
from here: HCI Research as Problem-Solving | Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems | |||
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2858036.2858283 | |||
cc [[Reading List]] | |||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040214388554084372/1040379933115043912 | |||
}}{{Message | |||
|Author=sneakers-the-rat | |||
|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/305044217393053697/2970b22bd769d0cd0ee1de79be500e85.png?size=1024 | |||
|Date Sent=22-11-12 03:30:30 | |||
|Channel=discourse-modeling | |||
|Text=I am definitely on team "scruffy" per Lindsay Poirier's typology (BTW "[[A Turn for the Scruffy]]" should be on the collective [[Reading List]] for anyone who hasn't come across it) and so yes definitely "Own-terminology" iterating into something shared, part of why i love the semwiki model of building them. On the other end of things for tomorrow - Is there any particular existing ontology/schema/etc. anyone in this group would like to have imported into the wiki for discourse modeling? | |||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1038988750677606432/1040830926629896212 | |||
}} | |||
== Linked Data == | |||
{{Message | |||
|Author=sneakers-the-rat | |||
|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/305044217393053697/2970b22bd769d0cd0ee1de79be500e85.png?size=1024 | |||
|Date Sent=22-11-08 23:32:39 | |||
|Channel=linked-data-activitypub | |||
|Text=To add to the [[Reading List#Linked Data]] on [[Linked Data]], [[Standards]], and [[Collaboration]]: a piece from one of the authors of [[ActivityPub]] on the merger of the distributed messaging and linked data communities that I think puts into context what a massive achievement AP was | |||
http://dustycloud.org/blog/on-standards-divisions-collaboration/ | |||
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1038983225348993184/1039683903864189020 | |||
}} | }} | ||