Talk:Social Systems - Revision history

Patel93 at 17:54, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T17:54:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:54, 12 November 2022
Line 25:		Line 25:
	* practical advice from studying the gamification literature may be valuable		* practical advice from studying the gamification literature may be valuable
	* psychological and sociological literature on volunteering and altruism may also inspire ideas (I'm trying to think from different angles)		* psychological and sociological literature on volunteering and altruism may also inspire ideas (I'm trying to think from different angles)

			<br>

Patel93 at 17:48, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T17:48:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 12 November 2022
Line 20:		Line 20:
	* metrics are used to "judge" researchers to allocate grants		* metrics are used to "judge" researchers to allocate grants
	* democratically incentives, but existing structures are not democratically enough		* democratically incentives, but existing structures are not democratically enough

			Jay (joining from the Interfaces group, adding some notes here for you)
			* badges from open science are a social signal of participating in a new practice (analog would be Rescognito.com for knowledge synthesis)
			* practical advice from studying the gamification literature may be valuable
			* psychological and sociological literature on volunteering and altruism may also inspire ideas (I'm trying to think from different angles)

Silvianetobessa at 16:15, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T16:15:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 12 November 2022
Line 60:		Line 60:
	Open Questions?		Open Questions?
	''' spec out different funding/incentive models for sustaining the work of synthesis '''		''' spec out different funding/incentive models for sustaining the work of synthesis '''

	'''developing incentive mechanisms for contributions to understanding the status of the knowledge frontier'''		'''developing incentive mechanisms for contributions to understanding the status of the knowledge frontier'''

	'''incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains'''		'''incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains'''

Silvianetobessa at 16:02, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T16:02:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 12 November 2022
Line 51:		Line 51:
	* Reputation & interactions in online space: how can we build better tools to help users navigate these spaces without being afraid of their reputation		* Reputation & interactions in online space: how can we build better tools to help users navigate these spaces without being afraid of their reputation

			Martin Q - if we create spaces to allow researchers to come together away from their high reputation game, how do they tap into research initiatives and new funders and funding mechanisms?

	~~Martin Q~~ - ~~if we create spaces to allow researchers to come together away from their high reputation game,~~ how do ~~they tap into research initiatives and new funders and funding mechanisms~~?		Open Questions - validate assumptions for the system that should work on a bigger scale?
			* how do we determine the systems that will work on a big scale without testing them on a large scale?
			* Valerii shares his company approach: small-scale test, update the pre-existing model + ar


	Open Questions?		Open Questions?
	developing incentive mechanisms for contributions to understanding the status of the knowledge frontier		''' spec out different funding/incentive models for sustaining the work of synthesis '''
	incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains.		'''developing incentive mechanisms for contributions to understanding the status of the knowledge frontier'''
			'''incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains'''

Silvianetobessa at 15:54, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T15:54:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 12 November 2022
Line 26:		Line 26:
	* funders can probably change the infrastructure and regulations		* funders can probably change the infrastructure and regulations

	Q: stakeholders?		'''Q: stakeholders?'''
	* Researchers		* Researchers
	* grant funders		* grant funders
Line 32:		Line 32:
	* Other: industry, taxpayers		* Other: industry, taxpayers

	Q - change ~~comeing~~ from which stakeholders?		'''Q - change coming from which stakeholders?'''
	* Biggest US and European		* Biggest US and European
	* smaller foundations, not supper novel ideas, a lot of outliers in Web3		* smaller foundations, not supper novel ideas, a lot of outliers in Web3
Line 41:		Line 41:
	* start small and demonstrate value		* start small and demonstrate value

	*		'''Push for the adoption of new systems:'''
			* works but not optimal: some systems work great on a small scale, but scale to promote less nice behaviour
			* Readiness of academia?
			* otoh, early adopters don't need to be big

			Nouran:
			*HCI community: the driving force is actually the academics
			* Tool building perspective: challenges?
			* Reputation & interactions in online space: how can we build better tools to help users navigate these spaces without being afraid of their reputation


			Martin Q - if we create spaces to allow researchers to come together away from their high reputation game, how do they tap into research initiatives and new funders and funding mechanisms?


			Open Questions?
			developing incentive mechanisms for contributions to understanding the status of the knowledge frontier
	incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains.		incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains.

Silvianetobessa at 15:37, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T15:37:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 12 November 2022
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* Questions about adoption		* Questions about adoption
	* Regulations (for example, in USA there's data open or they don't receive money anymore), in EU there's a proposal to evaluate researchers using diff metrics, such as openness		* Regulations (for example, in USA there's data open or they don't receive money anymore), in EU there's a proposal to evaluate researchers using diff metrics, such as openness


	Sílvia		Sílvia
	- old incentives, what are the ones in place besides reputation?		* old incentives, what are the ones in place besides reputation?
	- What should we keep in mind when creating		* What should we keep in mind when creating

	Angelina		Angelina
Line 23:		Line 22:


	~~Vallerii~~		* Most of the incentives are monetary (there are social)
	*		* researchers are not in a position to decide; they're put in the system
			* funders can probably change the infrastructure and regulations

			Q: stakeholders?
			* Researchers
			* grant funders
			* publishing agencies
			* Other: industry, taxpayers

			Q - change comeing from which stakeholders?
			* Biggest US and European
			* smaller foundations, not supper novel ideas, a lot of outliers in Web3
			* researcher will move to web3 in 10 to 20
			* Stepwise approach, led by biggest funder

			alternative view: demonstrate the reality of sth, Web3 and Desci - opportunity to demonstrate structures and mechanisms working in a small scale, and showcasing to onboard larger organizations
			* start small and demonstrate value

			*








	incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains.		incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains.

Silvianetobessa at 15:29, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T15:29:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:29, 12 November 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Open Notes==
			Martin
	* Reward contributions and how they affect behavior		* Reward contributions and how they affect behavior
	* Collect few opinions on how the rewarding can be done, other examples and what worked or didn't work		* Collect few opinions on how the rewarding can be done, other examples and what worked or didn't work

			Angelina:
			* Questions about adoption
			* Regulations (for example, in USA there's data open or they don't receive money anymore), in EU there's a proposal to evaluate researchers using diff metrics, such as openness


			Sílvia
			- old incentives, what are the ones in place besides reputation?
			- What should we keep in mind when creating

			Angelina
			* replacing the old system would be detrimental to the adoption
			* transfer their merits to the new system
			* progressive adoption of new metrics in behavior that accommodates certain

			Rafie
			* metrics are used to "judge" researchers to allocate grants
			* democratically incentives, but existing structures are not democratically enough


			Vallerii
			*



			incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains.

Silvianetobessa at 15:23, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T15:23:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 12 November 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Testing~~		* Reward contributions and how they affect behavior
			* Collect few opinions on how the rewarding can be done, other examples and what worked or didn't work

Silvianetobessa: Created page with "Testing"

2022-11-12T15:21:53Z

Created page with "Testing"

New page

Testing