Social Systems - Revision history

Silvianetobessa at 16:50, 13 November 2022

2022-11-13T16:50:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:50, 13 November 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\|Discord Channel URL=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040386737836412928		\|Discord Channel URL=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040386737836412928
	\|Facilitator=Sílvia Bessa		\|Facilitator=Sílvia Bessa
	\|Members=Angelina Lesnikova, Martin Karlsson, Matt Clancy, Raphael Walker, Sílvia Bessa, Valerii Kremnev, ~~Nouran Soliman~~		\|Members=Angelina Lesnikova, Martin Karlsson, Matt Clancy, Nouran Soliman, Raphael Walker, Sílvia Bessa, Valerii Kremnev, Jay Patel
	\|Buddies=Peer Review		\|Buddies=Peer Review
	}}		}}

Silvianetobessa at 16:48, 13 November 2022

2022-11-13T16:48:35Z

Show changes

Silvianetobessa at 16:16, 13 November 2022

2022-11-13T16:16:30Z

Show changes

Silvianetobessa at 17:35, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T17:35:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 12 November 2022
Line 24:		Line 24:
	== Goal for the workshop: ==		== Goal for the workshop: ==
	<blockquote>'''Resources''', such as a system map/synthesis of the problem space, synthesis/directory of tools, essential reading list, case study library, or shared synthesis benchmark datase</blockquote>		<blockquote>'''Resources''', such as a system map/synthesis of the problem space, synthesis/directory of tools, essential reading list, case study library, or shared synthesis benchmark datase</blockquote>
	* T'''he best tools in the world mean nothing if no one adopts them'''. Let’s merge together small scale testing ~~with early adopters~~, with rigorous validation.		* T'''he best tools in the world mean nothing if no one adopts them'''. Let’s merge together small scale testing, with rigorous validation.
	* Create a resource that the tool builders across the group can glance at to not lose sight of the critical point of adoption. With practical examples of how these mechanisms are designed, iterated upon, and how they can be tested and communicated to academia.		* Create a resource that the tool builders across the group can glance at to not lose sight of the critical point of adoption. With practical examples of how these mechanisms are designed, iterated upon, and how they can be tested and communicated to academia.
	** Learnings from past and ongoing attempts (what truly motivates sustainable participation).		** Learnings from past and ongoing attempts (what truly motivates sustainable participation).

Silvianetobessa at 17:30, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T17:30:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 12 November 2022
Line 28:		Line 28:
	** Learnings from past and ongoing attempts (what truly motivates sustainable participation).		** Learnings from past and ongoing attempts (what truly motivates sustainable participation).
	** "''A tool builder should check their assumptions agains this checklist before ...''"		** "''A tool builder should check their assumptions agains this checklist before ...''"
	** validate assumptions for the system that should work on a bigger scale		** validate assumptions for the system that should work on a bigger scale / models to test the incentives
			** Example:
			*** Reputation & interactions in online space: how can we build better tools to help users navigate these spaces without being afraid of their reputation

	=== Identified Open Problems ===		=== Identified Open Problems ===

Silvianetobessa at 17:27, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T17:27:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 12 November 2022
Line 28:		Line 28:
	** Learnings from past and ongoing attempts (what truly motivates sustainable participation).		** Learnings from past and ongoing attempts (what truly motivates sustainable participation).
	** "''A tool builder should check their assumptions agains this checklist before ...''"		** "''A tool builder should check their assumptions agains this checklist before ...''"
			** validate assumptions for the system that should work on a bigger scale

	=== Identified Open Problems ===		=== Identified Open Problems ===

Silvianetobessa at 17:24, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T17:24:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 12 November 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\|Discord Channel URL=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040386737836412928		\|Discord Channel URL=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040386737836412928
	\|Facilitator=Sílvia Bessa		\|Facilitator=Sílvia Bessa
	\|Members=Angelina Lesnikova~~, Eirini Malliaraki~~, Martin Karlsson, Matt Clancy, ~~Matthew Evans, Pao Siangliulue~~, Sílvia Bessa, Valerii Kremnev, ~~Raphael Walker~~		\|Members=Angelina Lesnikova, Martin Karlsson, Matt Clancy, Raphael Walker, Sílvia Bessa, Valerii Kremnev, Nouran Soliman
	\|Buddies=Peer Review		\|Buddies=Peer Review
	}}		}}

Silvianetobessa at 17:21, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T17:21:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:21, 12 November 2022
Line 23:		Line 23:

	== Goal for the workshop: ==		== Goal for the workshop: ==
	'''Resources''', such as a system map/synthesis of the problem space, synthesis/directory of tools, essential reading list, case study library, or shared synthesis benchmark ~~dataset~~		<blockquote>'''Resources''', such as a system map/synthesis of the problem space, synthesis/directory of tools, essential reading list, case study library, or shared synthesis benchmark datase</blockquote>

	* T'''he best tools in the world mean nothing if no one adopts them'''. Let’s merge together small scale testing with early adopters, with rigorous validation.		* T'''he best tools in the world mean nothing if no one adopts them'''. Let’s merge together small scale testing with early adopters, with rigorous validation.
	* Create a resource that the tool builders across the group can glance at to not lose sight of the critical point of adoption. With practical examples of how these mechanisms are designed, iterated upon, and how they can be tested and communicated to academia.		* Create a resource that the tool builders across the group can glance at to not lose sight of the critical point of adoption. With practical examples of how these mechanisms are designed, iterated upon, and how they can be tested and communicated to academia.

Silvianetobessa at 17:19, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T17:19:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:19, 12 November 2022
Line 27:		Line 27:
	* T'''he best tools in the world mean nothing if no one adopts them'''. Let’s merge together small scale testing with early adopters, with rigorous validation.		* T'''he best tools in the world mean nothing if no one adopts them'''. Let’s merge together small scale testing with early adopters, with rigorous validation.
	* Create a resource that the tool builders across the group can glance at to not lose sight of the critical point of adoption. With practical examples of how these mechanisms are designed, iterated upon, and how they can be tested and communicated to academia.		* Create a resource that the tool builders across the group can glance at to not lose sight of the critical point of adoption. With practical examples of how these mechanisms are designed, iterated upon, and how they can be tested and communicated to academia.
	** "A tool builder should check their assumptions agains this checklist before ..."		** Learnings from past and ongoing attempts (what truly motivates sustainable participation).
			** "''A tool builder should check their assumptions agains this checklist before ...''"

	=== Identified Open Problems ===		=== Identified Open Problems ===

Silvianetobessa at 17:18, 12 November 2022

2022-11-12T17:18:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:18, 12 November 2022
Line 20:		Line 20:
	* [https://scienceplusplus.org/metascience/ An Engine of Improvement for the Social Processes of Science], by Nielsen and Qiu		* [https://scienceplusplus.org/metascience/ An Engine of Improvement for the Social Processes of Science], by Nielsen and Qiu

	~~== Identified Open Problems ==~~		*

	* ~~Acceptance and onboarding of scientists, even if we have a model that works in a small setting~~
	* Value attribution:
	** How do you distribute rewards?
	** Opportunity side: new tools looking at ways to provide input to that distribution mechanism
	** How do we connect the two sides?
	* How do we test the behavior of a model as it scales?
	** How do we predict the inventive structures or perverse behavior will arise as it’s adopted for a large number of players
	* Incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining living lit reviews in both domains

	== Goal for the workshop: ==		== Goal for the workshop: ==
	'''Resources''', such as a system map/synthesis of the problem space, synthesis/directory of tools, essential reading list, case study library, or shared synthesis benchmark dataset		'''Resources''', such as a system map/synthesis of the problem space, synthesis/directory of tools, essential reading list, case study library, or shared synthesis benchmark dataset

	* ~~The~~ best tools in the world mean nothing if no one adopts them. Let’s merge together small scale testing with early adopters, with rigorous validation. Create a resource that the tool builders across the group can glance at to not lose sight of the critical point of adoption. With practical examples of how these mechanisms are designed, iterated upon, and how they can be tested and communicated to academia. * A tool builder should check their assumptions agains this checklist before ...		* T'''he best tools in the world mean nothing if no one adopts them'''. Let’s merge together small scale testing with early adopters, with rigorous validation.
			* Create a resource that the tool builders across the group can glance at to not lose sight of the critical point of adoption. With practical examples of how these mechanisms are designed, iterated upon, and how they can be tested and communicated to academia.
			** "A tool builder should check their assumptions agains this checklist before ..."

	== ~~Overlapping with other groups?~~ ==		=== Identified Open Problems ===
			# Acceptance and onboarding of scientists, even if we have a model that works in a small setting
			# Value attribution:
			#* How do you distribute rewards?
			#* Opportunity side: new tools looking at ways to provide input to that distribution mechanism
			#* How do we connect the two sides?
			# How do we test the behavior of a model as it scales?
			#* How do we predict the inventive structures or perverse behavior that will arise as it’s adopted for a large number of players?
			# Incentive mechanisms for contributing and maintaining a collective knowledge graph