https://synthesis.jon-e.net/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Open_Science_Framework 2026-04-18T10:08:41Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.38.4 https://synthesis.jon-e.net/index.php?title=Open_Science_Framework&diff=1285&oldid=prev 2022-11-13T03:43:08Z

<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Discord: </span> new section</span></p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>== Discord ==<br /> <br /> {{Message<br /> |Author=joelchan86<br /> |Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/322545403876868096/6dd171845a7a4e30603d98ae510c77b8.png?size=1024<br /> |Date Sent=22-11-13 03:43:07<br /> |Channel=incentive-mechanisms<br /> |Text=a bit further afield, i'd point to the [[Open Science Framework]] as a thoughtful case study in incentive mechanism design focused on integration into *intrinsic* benefits (i'm more thoughtful about my science, i can easily document things so i don't forget them)<br /> <br /> this podcast interview is a decent look into how he thinks about things: https://everythinghertz.com/69<br /> <br /> if i read him right, i sort of agree that infrastructure (possibility) an usability and communities (norms) are prior to / foundational to incentives and policy. top-down incentives and policies that don't align with existing norms and usable practices may risk incentivizing 'just comply with it' practices or just fall flat, like some data sharing mandates.<br /> |Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1041061650977009704/1041196489214537728<br /> }}</div>

Jonny