Jonny: Created page with "{{Participant |Timezone=America/Los Angeles (GMT−08:00/GMT−07:00) |Affiliation=Invisible College }} {{Workshop Submission |Interest=The Invisible College was started in the 1600s by Robert Boyle, of "Boyle's Law". The Academy in Boyle's day had become corrupt; depending on authorities (often the Church) to determine truth, rather than evidence and experiment. Scientists instead convened in the Invisible College to discuss empirical approaches to understanding the wo..."

2022-10-26T20:26:27Z

Created page with "{{Participant |Timezone=America/Los Angeles (GMT−08:00/GMT−07:00) |Affiliation=Invisible College }} {{Workshop Submission |Interest=The Invisible College was started in the 1600s by Robert Boyle, of "Boyle's Law". The Academy in Boyle's day had become corrupt; depending on authorities (often the Church) to determine truth, rather than evidence and experiment. Scientists instead convened in the Invisible College to discuss empirical approaches to understanding the wo..."

New page

{{Participant
|Timezone=America/Los Angeles (GMT−08:00/GMT−07:00)
|Affiliation=Invisible College
}}
{{Workshop Submission
|Interest=The Invisible College was started in the 1600s by Robert Boyle, of "Boyle's Law". The Academy in Boyle's day had become corrupt; depending on authorities (often the Church) to determine truth, rather than evidence and experiment. Scientists instead convened in the Invisible College to discuss empirical approaches to understanding the world. The College evolved into the Royal Society of London, which desired to publish its results more broadly, and invented the process of *Peer Review* to choose what to publish.

Peer Review has now become the authoritative game in Academia. We are part of a new Invisible College, convening in person and on the internet, to both do research, and create a new scientific dialogue, with new tools, to support our research. We have recently found ourselves developing a new system of Peer Review.

This new Peer Review is free of the constraints of paper. We no longer need a small group to choose up-front which papers others can read. Instead, the readers review the papers they read. To identify expertise, each reader also reviews the reviewers, defining which ones he trusts, which creates a web of scientific trust that can cover the globe. Furthermore, from the structure of this web emerges an incentive to detect, counteract, and penalize any attempts at gaming it. Try out prototype at https://peeryview.org

The new Peer Review will also allow authors to contribute to a web of discrete Points, rather than just Papers. An early prototype is available at https://braid.org/point
|Frame=Tool-builder
|Materials=Demos:
https://peeryview.org/about
https://braid.org/point

Slide presentations:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1iyd4Kb3vjiNJgxr08avwNQFFnUbHzkJWGfFA8kDR18A/edit
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SRWbyA2uCnda1JwAZ3JiDKFt1-tWxyjK_FgqUSkBPjc/edit
|Organizer Topics=Review, Social Systems
}}

Katherine Baney - Revision history