Jay Patel - Revision history

Jonny: Undo revision 445 by Jonny (talk)

2022-10-26T21:06:58Z

Undo revision 445 by Jonny (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:06, 26 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Participant		{{Participant
	\|Timezone=America/~~Argentina/Buenos Aires~~ (~~GMT−03~~:00/~~GMT−03~~:00)		\|Timezone=America/New York (GMT−05:00/GMT−04:00)
	\|Affiliation=~~Minerva~~ University		\|Affiliation=Oasis Lab, University of Maryland
	~~\|Projects=Abstract Poetry~~
	\|Table Assignment=Table 3		\|Table Assignment=Table 3
	}}		}}

Jonny at 20:27, 26 October 2022

2022-10-26T20:27:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 26 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Participant		{{Participant
	\|Timezone=America/~~New York~~ (~~GMT−05~~:00/~~GMT−04~~:00)		\|Timezone=America/Argentina/Buenos Aires (GMT−03:00/GMT−03:00)
	\|Affiliation=~~Oasis Lab,~~ University ~~of Maryland~~		\|Affiliation=Minerva University
			\|Projects=Abstract Poetry
			\|Table Assignment=Table 3
	}}		}}
	{{Workshop Submission		{{Workshop Submission

Jonny at 07:04, 21 October 2022

2022-10-21T07:04:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:04, 21 October 2022
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|Frame=Tool-builder		\|Frame=Tool-builder
	\|Materials=I will observe the workshop in order to learn experts' emerging ideas on the topic of systematic reviews, peer review, and general lessons on building scholarly infrastructures. In the past, my psychological and educational research has prepared me to think about how knowledge of cognition and learning may be used to inspire more user-friendly peer review processes (socio-cognitive lens). I do not have publications in this area, though I have developed a "quality practices checklists" that I am attaching here.		\|Materials=I will observe the workshop in order to learn experts' emerging ideas on the topic of systematic reviews, peer review, and general lessons on building scholarly infrastructures. In the past, my psychological and educational research has prepared me to think about how knowledge of cognition and learning may be used to inspire more user-friendly peer review processes (socio-cognitive lens). I do not have publications in this area, though I have developed a "quality practices checklists" that I am attaching here.
			\|Organizer Topics=Review, Scholcomm, Provenance
	}}		}}

Jonny: Created page with "{{Participant |Timezone=America/New York (GMT−05:00/GMT−04:00) |Affiliation=Oasis Lab, University of Maryland }} {{Workshop Submission |Interest=I'm a PhD student in OASISlab (Joel's student). My current interest lies in developing peer review processes and software tools to support scholars in implementing those processes. Currently, peer review lacks consistency, comprehensiveness, rigor, and and inefficient to engage with. As a result, peer reviewers procrastinate..."

2022-10-20T04:21:14Z

Created page with "{{Participant |Timezone=America/New York (GMT−05:00/GMT−04:00) |Affiliation=Oasis Lab, University of Maryland }} {{Workshop Submission |Interest=I'm a PhD student in OASISlab (Joel's student). My current interest lies in developing peer review processes and software tools to support scholars in implementing those processes. Currently, peer review lacks consistency, comprehensiveness, rigor, and and inefficient to engage with. As a result, peer reviewers procrastinate..."

New page

{{Participant
|Timezone=America/New York (GMT−05:00/GMT−04:00)
|Affiliation=Oasis Lab, University of Maryland
}}
{{Workshop Submission
|Interest=I'm a PhD student in OASISlab (Joel's student). My current interest lies in developing peer review processes and software tools to support scholars in implementing those processes. Currently, peer review lacks consistency, comprehensiveness, rigor, and and inefficient to engage with. As a result, peer reviewers procrastinate, write brief reviews, and are inconsistent (often biased) in their feedback. I will study how peer review checklists can improve comprehensiveness, rigor, and consistency. Ultimately, I will develop software tools that enable consistent use, data collection, storage, and analysis of peer review processes.
|Frame=Tool-builder
|Materials=I will observe the workshop in order to learn experts' emerging ideas on the topic of systematic reviews, peer review, and general lessons on building scholarly infrastructures. In the past, my psychological and educational research has prepared me to think about how knowledge of cognition and learning may be used to inspire more user-friendly peer review processes (socio-cognitive lens). I do not have publications in this area, though I have developed a "quality practices checklists" that I am attaching here.
}}