Deniz Aydemir - Revision history

Jonny: Undo revision 464 by Jonny (talk)

2022-10-26T21:20:51Z

Undo revision 464 by Jonny (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 26 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Participant		{{Participant
	~~\|Timezone=America/Argentina/Buenos Aires (GMT−03:00/GMT−03:00)~~
	~~\|Affiliation=Minerva University~~		\|Table Assignment=Table 5}}
	~~\|Projects=Abstract Poetry~~
	\|Table Assignment=Table 5
	}}
	{{Workshop Submission		{{Workshop Submission
	\|Interest=It is becoming increasingly important to create a standard for how knowledge graphs and ontologies can be made interoperable, and I propose solving this with what I am calling a "Discourse Protocol". More and more users are thinking about how best to structure their own research and writing using personal ontologies, and tools like Roam, Logseq, Obsidian, Notion, and now Tana (among others) are continuing to add more ways for users to create semantic relationships within their notes. We want a world where my knowledge graph can reference your knowledge graph, but I shouldn't have to understand your whole personal ontology in order to reference content you've published. We need to create some sort of standard protocol for knowledge content in order to make it possible for different users using different tools and their own personal ontologies to reference each other's work in a sensible way. There are existing ontologies that attempt to be globally applicable, but as a community we should be forming a well-supported and future-proof standard "Discourse Protocol" that both creates a general structure through which users can interface their personal knowledge graphs, and also creates a clear way for all these disparate note-taking applications to publish interoperable content.		\|Interest=It is becoming increasingly important to create a standard for how knowledge graphs and ontologies can be made interoperable, and I propose solving this with what I am calling a "Discourse Protocol". More and more users are thinking about how best to structure their own research and writing using personal ontologies, and tools like Roam, Logseq, Obsidian, Notion, and now Tana (among others) are continuing to add more ways for users to create semantic relationships within their notes. We want a world where my knowledge graph can reference your knowledge graph, but I shouldn't have to understand your whole personal ontology in order to reference content you've published. We need to create some sort of standard protocol for knowledge content in order to make it possible for different users using different tools and their own personal ontologies to reference each other's work in a sensible way. There are existing ontologies that attempt to be globally applicable, but as a community we should be forming a well-supported and future-proof standard "Discourse Protocol" that both creates a general structure through which users can interface their personal knowledge graphs, and also creates a clear way for all these disparate note-taking applications to publish interoperable content.

Jonny: Undo revision 499 by Jonny (talk)

2022-10-26T21:20:23Z

Undo revision 499 by Jonny (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 26 October 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|Affiliation=Minerva University		\|Affiliation=Minerva University
	\|Projects=Abstract Poetry		\|Projects=Abstract Poetry
	\|Table Assignment=Table 3		\|Table Assignment=Table 5
	}}		}}
	{{Workshop Submission		{{Workshop Submission

Jonny at 20:51, 26 October 2022

2022-10-26T20:51:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 26 October 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|Affiliation=Minerva University		\|Affiliation=Minerva University
	\|Projects=Abstract Poetry		\|Projects=Abstract Poetry
	\|Table Assignment=Table 5		\|Table Assignment=Table 3
	}}		}}
	{{Workshop Submission		{{Workshop Submission

Jonny at 20:33, 26 October 2022

2022-10-26T20:33:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 26 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Participant}}		{{Participant
			\|Timezone=America/Argentina/Buenos Aires (GMT−03:00/GMT−03:00)
			\|Affiliation=Minerva University
			\|Projects=Abstract Poetry
			\|Table Assignment=Table 5
			}}
	{{Workshop Submission		{{Workshop Submission
	\|Interest=It is becoming increasingly important to create a standard for how knowledge graphs and ontologies can be made interoperable, and I propose solving this with what I am calling a "Discourse Protocol". More and more users are thinking about how best to structure their own research and writing using personal ontologies, and tools like Roam, Logseq, Obsidian, Notion, and now Tana (among others) are continuing to add more ways for users to create semantic relationships within their notes. We want a world where my knowledge graph can reference your knowledge graph, but I shouldn't have to understand your whole personal ontology in order to reference content you've published. We need to create some sort of standard protocol for knowledge content in order to make it possible for different users using different tools and their own personal ontologies to reference each other's work in a sensible way. There are existing ontologies that attempt to be globally applicable, but as a community we should be forming a well-supported and future-proof standard "Discourse Protocol" that both creates a general structure through which users can interface their personal knowledge graphs, and also creates a clear way for all these disparate note-taking applications to publish interoperable content.		\|Interest=It is becoming increasingly important to create a standard for how knowledge graphs and ontologies can be made interoperable, and I propose solving this with what I am calling a "Discourse Protocol". More and more users are thinking about how best to structure their own research and writing using personal ontologies, and tools like Roam, Logseq, Obsidian, Notion, and now Tana (among others) are continuing to add more ways for users to create semantic relationships within their notes. We want a world where my knowledge graph can reference your knowledge graph, but I shouldn't have to understand your whole personal ontology in order to reference content you've published. We need to create some sort of standard protocol for knowledge content in order to make it possible for different users using different tools and their own personal ontologies to reference each other's work in a sensible way. There are existing ontologies that attempt to be globally applicable, but as a community we should be forming a well-supported and future-proof standard "Discourse Protocol" that both creates a general structure through which users can interface their personal knowledge graphs, and also creates a clear way for all these disparate note-taking applications to publish interoperable content.

Jonny: Created page with "{{Participant}} {{Workshop Submission |Interest=It is becoming increasingly important to create a standard for how knowledge graphs and ontologies can be made interoperable, and I propose solving this with what I am calling a "Discourse Protocol". More and more users are thinking about how best to structure their own research and writing using personal ontologies, and tools like Roam, Logseq, Obsidian, Notion, and now Tana (among others) are continuing to add more ways f..."

2022-10-26T20:20:59Z

Created page with "{{Participant}} {{Workshop Submission |Interest=It is becoming increasingly important to create a standard for how knowledge graphs and ontologies can be made interoperable, and I propose solving this with what I am calling a "Discourse Protocol". More and more users are thinking about how best to structure their own research and writing using personal ontologies, and tools like Roam, Logseq, Obsidian, Notion, and now Tana (among others) are continuing to add more ways f..."

New page

{{Participant}}
{{Workshop Submission
|Interest=It is becoming increasingly important to create a standard for how knowledge graphs and ontologies can be made interoperable, and I propose solving this with what I am calling a "Discourse Protocol". More and more users are thinking about how best to structure their own research and writing using personal ontologies, and tools like Roam, Logseq, Obsidian, Notion, and now Tana (among others) are continuing to add more ways for users to create semantic relationships within their notes. We want a world where my knowledge graph can reference your knowledge graph, but I shouldn't have to understand your whole personal ontology in order to reference content you've published. We need to create some sort of standard protocol for knowledge content in order to make it possible for different users using different tools and their own personal ontologies to reference each other's work in a sensible way. There are existing ontologies that attempt to be globally applicable, but as a community we should be forming a well-supported and future-proof standard "Discourse Protocol" that both creates a general structure through which users can interface their personal knowledge graphs, and also creates a clear way for all these disparate note-taking applications to publish interoperable content.
|Frame=Tool-builder
|Materials=I have not written much formally on this topic, but I have been working on my own personal note-taking system and ontology, and have worked to publish my notes in a way that prototypes a first step for proper knowledge graph publishing.

You can visit https://denizay.org to see my published knowledge graph. The relevant takeaway from the structure of my website is that each block maintains a unique ID in the form of a URL that can be referenced by other sources (you can click the arrow on the right of a block to visit that block's unique page). I believe URL links will be the way to reference blocks between disparate knowledge graphs, hence my desire to create this type of publishing system. This website is a subset of my Logseq notes published using my own scripts (you can see some of the work on this at my github: https://github.com/daydemir, though I haven't made it all public yet).

My background is not in academia related research, but I wanted to provide my two cents in case it would be of use for this conference. In any case, I'm excited to see how it goes and will be following along!
|Organizer Topics=Graphs, Social Systems, Semantic Web
}}