Claim - Revision history

Jonny at 18:59, 23 November 2022

2022-11-23T18:59:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 23 November 2022
Line 30:		Line 30:
	https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-51020-0_3		https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-51020-0_3
	\|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1041061650977009704/1041194438329901137		\|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1041061650977009704/1041194438329901137
			}}{{Message
			\|Author=Wutbot
			\|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/709165833888464966/d959819a9a72aa307c6ef1b91d7f94a2.png?size=1024
			\|Date Sent=22-11-23 18:59:16
			\|Channel=discourse-modeling
			\|Text=[[claim]] claims and questions dominate in natural conversation; the imbalance of sources & evidence is quite stark. This aligns with my mental model of conversational charity, where we assume our interlocutors could ground their statements in evidence if pressed, but skip this step in the interest of time.
			\|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1038988750677606432/1045050924466458725
	}}		}}

Jonny at 03:34, 13 November 2022

2022-11-13T03:34:59Z

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 and [[Evidence]] convergence/contrasts across users of the [[Roam Discourse Graph extension]] in terms of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidence
 |Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040600256485797889/1040702747659489391
 }}

Jonny: /* Discord */ new section

2022-11-11T19:00:11Z

Discord: new section

New page

== Discord ==

{{Message
|Author=joelchan86
|Avatar=https://cdn.discordapp.com/avatars/322545403876868096/6dd171845a7a4e30603d98ae510c77b8.png?size=1024
|Date Sent=22-11-11 19:01:10
|Channel=what is obsidian-logseq-roam
|Text=i agree it's not universal! my feeling is that [[Claim]]: a statement (claim or evidence) might be the more universal element:
- empirical work also consists of statements about the world (this is less controversial)
- design/technological innovation rests in part on claims about a) what is needed in the world, what is hard to do, constraints, and b) what is needed to succeed: examples here: https://deepscienceventures.com/content/the-outcomes-graph-2 (h/t <@559775193242009610>)
- theories often consist of systems of core claims (e.g., in models like what <@824740026575355906> and <@734802666441408532> are working with, where we can think of the claims as subgraphs of the overall knowledge graph)

see, e.g., [[Evidence]] from this review of models of scientific knowledge https://publish.obsidian.md/joelchan-notes/discourse-graph/evidence/EVD+-+Four+positivist+epistemological+models+from+philosophy+of+science%2C+including+Popper%2C+emphasiz...+statements+as+a+core+component+of+scientific+knowledge+-+%40harsDesigningScientificKnowledge2001

and [[Evidence]] convergence/contrasts across users of the [[Roam Discourse Graph extension]] in terms of building blocks: common thread across all was Evidence
|Link=https://discord.com/channels/1029514961782849607/1040600256485797889/1040702747659489391
}}